The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Monaural Sound Source Separation by Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Temporal Continuity and Sparseness Criteria
Abstract
An unsupervised learning algorithm for the separation of sound sources in one-channel music signals is presented. The algorithm is based on factorizing the magnitude spectrogram of an input signal into a sum of components, each of which has a fixed magnitude spectrum and a time-varying gain. Each sound source, in turn, is modeled as a sum of one or more components. The parameters of the components are estimated by minimizing the reconstruction error between the input spectrogram and the model, while restricting the component spectrograms to be nonnegative and favoring components whose gains are slowly varying and sparse. Temporal continuity is favored by using a cost term which is the sum of squared differences between the gains in adjacent frames, and sparseness is favored by penalizing nonzero gains. The proposed iterative estimation algorithm is initialized with random values, and the gains and the spectra are then alternatively updated using multiplicative update rules until the values converge. Simulation experiments were carried out using generated mixtures of pitched musical instrument samples and drum sounds. The performance of the proposed method was compared with independent subspace analysis and basic nonnegative matrix factorization, which are based on the same linear model. According to these simulations, the proposed method enables a better separation quality than the previous algorithms. Especially, the temporal continuity criterion improved the detection of pitched musical sounds. The sparseness criterion did not produce significant improvements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1?
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1997) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00169-7 · Cited by 3,642
Cited by
Multimodal Data Fusion: An Overview of Methods, Challenges, and Prospects
Lahat, D., Adali, T., & Jutten, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2460697 · Cited by 1,296
Févotte, C., Bertin, N., & Durrieu, J.-L. (2009) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.04-08-771 · Cited by 1,119
Audio-Visual Scene Analysis with Self-Supervised Multisensory Features
Owens, A., & Efros, A. A. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01231-1_39 · Cited by 704
Machine learning in acoustics: Theory and applications
Bianco, M. J., Gerstoft, P., Traer, J., Ozanich, E., Roch, M. A., Gannot, S., & Deledalle, C.-A. (2019) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.5133944 · Cited by 609
Multichannel Nonnegative Matrix Factorization in Convolutive Mixtures for Audio Source Separation
Ozerov, A., & Fevotte, C. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2009.2031510 · Cited by 607
Metadata
- Authors
- Virtanen, T.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1066-1074
- ISSN
- 1558-7916 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150415460
- Cited by
- 1,005
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monaural Sound Source Separation by Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Temporal Continuity and Sparseness Criteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tasl.2006.885253
- The paper
- Virtanen, T. (2007). Monaural Sound Source Separation by Nonnegative Matrix Factorization With Temporal Continuity and Sparseness Criteria. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tasl.2006.885253
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.