Cited by 52Electromagnetic Fields and Biological EffectsElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsMicrobial Inactivation Methods

Cylindrical cell membranes in uniform applied electric fields: Validation of a transport lattice method

Stewart Jr., D.A., Gowrishankar, T.R., Smith, K.C., Weaver, J.C.·2005·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The frequency and time domain transmembrane voltage responses of a cylindrical cell in an external electric field are calculated using a transport lattice, which allows solution of a variety of biologically relevant transport problems with complex cell geometry and field interactions. Here we demonstrate the method for a cylindrical membrane geometry and compare results with known analytical solutions. Results of transport lattice simulations on a Cartesian lattice are found to have discrepancies with the analytical solutions due to the limited volume of the system model and approximations for the local membrane model on the Cartesian lattice. Better agreement is attained when using a triangular mesh to represent the geometry rather than a Cartesian lattice. The transport lattice method can be readily extended to more sophisticated cell, organelle, and tissue configurations. Local membrane models within a system lattice can also include nonlinear responses such as electroporation and ion-channel gating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2005.856030

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As the frequency of the field increases, the high membrane field gain diminishes, allowing for higher field intensities to penetrate into the cell.

    “as the frequency of the field increases, the high membrane field gain diminishes, allowing for higher field intensities to penetrate into the cell.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart Jr., D. A., Gowrishankar, T. R., Smith, K. C., & Weaver, J. C.
Affiliations
Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2005-10
Volume
52
Issue
10
Pages
1643-1653
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148171986
Cited by
52
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM063857, R01-GM63857)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Microbial Inactivation Methods
Keywords
transmembrane voltage, external electric field, membrane transport, triangular meshes, electroporation, channel gating, cell shape
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Membrane, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Electric Conductivity, Electromagnetic Fields, Humans, Membrane Potentials, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review