The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of First-Derivative Based QRS Detection Algorithms
Open accessAbstract
Accurate QRS detection is an important first step for the analysis of heart rate variability. Algorithms based on the differentiated ECG are computationally efficient and hence ideal for real-time analysis of large datasets. Here, we analyze traditional first-derivative based squaring function (Hamilton-Tompkins) and Hilbert transform-based methods for QRS detection and their modifications with improved detection thresholds. On a standard ECG dataset, the Hamilton-Tompkins algorithm had the highest detection accuracy (99.68% sensitivity, 99.63% positive predictivity) but also the largest time error. The modified Hamilton-Tompkins algorithm as well as the Hilbert transform-based algorithms had comparable, though slightly lower, accuracy; yet these automated algorithms present an advantage for real-time applications by avoiding human intervention in threshold determination. The high accuracy of the Hilbert transform-based method compared to detection with the second derivative of the ECG is ascribable to its inherently uniform magnitude spectrum. For all algorithms, detection errors occurred mainly in beats with decreased signal slope, such as wide arrhythmic beats or attenuated beats. For best performance, a combination of the squaring function and Hilbert transform-based algorithms can be applied such that differences in detection will point to abnormalities in the signal that can be further analyzed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use
Malik, M., Bigger, J. T., Camm, A. J., Kleiger, R. E., Malliani, A., Moss, A. J., & Schwartz, P. J. (1996) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014868 · Cited by 15,289
Goldberger, A. L., Amaral, L. A. N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J. M., Ivanov, P. C., Mark, R. G., Mietus, J. E., Moody, G. B., Peng, C.-K., & Stanley, H. E. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215 · Cited by 14,809
A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm
Pan, J., & Tompkins, W. J. (1985) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.1985.325532 · Cited by 7,855
Cardiovascular neural regulation explored in the frequency domain.
Malliani, A., Pagani, M., Lombardi, F., & Cerutti, S. (1991) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.84.2.482 · Cited by 3,569
Autonomic activity during human sleep as a function of time and sleep stage
Trinder, J., Kleiman, J., Carrington, M., Smith, S., Breen, S., Tan, N., & Kim, Y. (2001) · Journal of Sleep Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2869.2001.00263.x · Cited by 507
Cited by
A novel method for detecting R-peaks in electrocardiogram (ECG) signal
Manikandan, M. S., & Soman, K. P. (2012) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2011.03.004 · Cited by 393
Sex-Related Differences in Photoplethysmography Signals Measured From Finger and Toe
Dehghanojamahalleh, S., & Kaya, M. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine · doi:10.1109/jtehm.2019.2938506 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Arzeno, N. M., Deng, Z.-D., & Poon, C.-S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 478-484
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2136293280
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.