The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis
Open accessAbstract
This paper describes a control architecture and intent recognition approach for the real-time supervisory control of a powered lower limb prosthesis. The approach infers user intent to stand, sit, or walk, by recognizing patterns in prosthesis sensor data in real time, without the need for instrumentation of the sound-side leg. Specifically, the intent recognizer utilizes time-based features extracted from frames of prosthesis signals, which are subsequently reduced to a lower dimensionality (for computational efficiency). These data are initially used to train intent models, which classify the patterns as standing, sitting, or walking. The trained models are subsequently used to infer the user's intent in real time. In addition to describing the generalized control approach, this paper describes the implementation of this approach on a single unilateral transfemoral amputee subject and demonstrates via experiments the effectiveness of the approach. In the real-time supervisory control experiments, the intent recognizer identified all 90 activity-mode transitions, switching the underlying middle-level controllers without any perceivable delay by the user. The intent recognizer also identified six activity-mode transitions, which were not intended by the user. Due to the intentional overlapping functionality of the middle-level controllers, the incorrect classifications neither caused problems in functionality, nor were perceived by the user.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm
Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979) · Applied Statistics · doi:10.2307/2346830 · Cited by 14,523
Jolliffe, I. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501 · Cited by 14,310
McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471721182 · Cited by 10,991
Martinez, A. M., & Kak, A. C. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908974 · Cited by 3,249
A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control
Englehart, K., & Hudgins, B. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.813539 · Cited by 1,743
(2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471271357.ch12 · Cited by 1,656
The biomechanics and motor control of human gait : normal, elderly and pathological
Winter, D. A. (1991) · University of Waterloo Press eBooks · Cited by 1,428
The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological
Brand, R. A. (1992) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92)90236-t · Cited by 1,103
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- mitchell, 1997, Machine Learning
- 10.1109/BIOROB.2008.4762919 · doi:10.1109/biorob.2008.4762919
- popovic, 1988, Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 337
- nagano, 1998, comparison of new approaches to estimate mechanical output of individual joints in vertical jumps, J Biomech, 31, 951, 10.1016/S0021-9290(98)00094-3 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00094-3
- 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00083-6 · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)00083-6
- 10.1016/0021-9290(95)00115-8 · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)00115-8
Cited by
Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review
Tucker, M. R., Olivier, J., Pagel, A., Bleuler, H., Bouri, M., Lambercy, O., Millán, J. D. R., Riener, R., Vallery, H., & Gassert, R. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-12-1 · Cited by 1,047
“[24] employed a GMM to switch between sitting, walking, and standing modes using the embedded sensors in an actuated transfemoral prosthesis.”
InfluentialHuang, H., Zhang, F., Hargrove, L. J., Dou, Z., Rogers, D. R., & Englehart, K. B. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2161671 · Cited by 542
A Survey of Robots in Healthcare
Kyrarini, M., Lygerakis, F., Rajavenkatanarayanan, A., Sevastopoulos, C., Nambiappan, H. R., Chaitanya, K. K., Babu, A. R., Mathew, J., & Makedon, F. (2021) · Technologies · doi:10.3390/technologies9010008 · Cited by 384
Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use
Farina, D., Vujaklija, I., Brånemark, R., Bull, A. M. J., Dietl, H., Graimann, B., Hargrove, L. J., Hoffmann, K.-P., Huang, H., Ingvarsson, T., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00732-x · Cited by 263
A survey of sensor fusion methods in wearable robotics
Novak, D., & Riener, R. (2015) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.012 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Varol, H. A., Sup, F., & Goldfarb, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 542-551
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2144910137
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2009.2034734
- The paper
- Varol, H. A., Sup, F., & Goldfarb, M. (2010). Multiclass Real-Time Intent Recognition of a Powered Lower Limb Prosthesis. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2009.2034734
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
