The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward an EEG-Based Recognition of Music Liking Using Time-Frequency Analysis
Abstract
Affective phenomena, as reflected through brain activity, could constitute an effective index for the detection of music preference. In this vein, this paper focuses on the discrimination between subjects' electroencephalogram (EEG) responses to self-assessed liked or disliked music, acquired during an experimental procedure, by evaluating different feature extraction approaches and classifiers to this end. Feature extraction is based on time-frequency (TF) analysis by implementing three TF techniques, i.e., spectrogram, Zhao-Atlas-Marks distribution and Hilbert-Huang spectrum (HHS). Feature estimation also accounts for physiological parameters that relate to EEG frequency bands, reference states, time intervals, and hemispheric asymmetries. Classification is performed by employing four classifiers, i.e., support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors (k -NN), quadratic and Mahalanobis distance-based discriminant analyses. According to the experimental results across nine subjects, best classification accuracy {86.52 (±0.76)%} was achieved using k-NN and HHS-based feature vectors ( FVs) representing a bilateral average activity, referred to a resting period, in β (13-30 Hz) and γ (30-49 Hz) bands. Activity in these bands may point to a connection between music preference and emotional arousal phenomena. Furthermore, HHS-based FVs were found to be robust against noise corruption. The outcomes of this study provide early evidence and pave the way for the development of a generalized brain computer interface for music preference recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nearest neighbor pattern classification
Cover, T., & Hart, P. (1967) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1967.1053964 · Cited by 16,936
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Kohavi, R. (1995) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19712698 · Cited by 10,909
An argument for basic emotions
Ekman, P. (1992) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411068 · Cited by 9,646
Blood, A. J., & Zatorre, R. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.191355898 · Cited by 2,814
Cited by
Emotions Recognition Using EEG Signals: A Survey
Alarcao, S. M., & Fonseca, M. J. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2714671 · Cited by 1,201
Feature Extraction and Selection for Emotion Recognition from EEG
Jenke, R., Peer, A., & Buss, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2014.2339834 · Cited by 1,081
Identifying Stable Patterns over Time for Emotion Recognition from EEG
Zheng, W.-L., Zhu, J.-Y., & Lu, B.-L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2712143 · Cited by 990
Emotion recognition using multi-modal data and machine learning techniques: A tutorial and review
Zhang, J., Yin, Z., Chen, P., & Nichele, S. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.011 · Cited by 806
Houssein, E. H., Hammad, A., & Ali, A. A. (2022) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-022-07292-4 · Cited by 426
MPED: A Multi-Modal Physiological Emotion Database for Discrete Emotion Recognition
Song, T., Zheng, W., Lu, C., Zong, Y., Zhang, X., & Cui, Z. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2891579 · Cited by 336
Data augmentation for EEG-based emotion recognition with deep convolutional neural networks
Wang, F., Zhong, S.-H., Peng, J., Jiang, J., & Liu, Y. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73600-6_8 · Cited by 256
EEG-Based Emotion Recognition Using Hierarchical Network With Subnetwork Nodes
Yang, Y., Wu, Q. M. J., Zheng, W.-L., & Lu, B.-L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2017.2685338 · Cited by 141
Taran, S., & Bajaj, V. (2019) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.03.015 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Hadjidimitriou, S. K., & Hadjileontiadis, L. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3498-3510
- ISSN
- 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2531
- OpenAlex
- W2045468728
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.