Cited by 55Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesWireless Power Transfer SystemsUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

Numerical analysis and design of single-source multicoil TMS for deep and focused brain stimulation

Gomez, Luis, Cajko, Frantishek, Hernandez-Garcia, Luis, Grbic, Anthony, Michielssen, Eric·2013·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a tool for noninvasive stimulation of neuronal tissue used for research in cognitive neuroscience and to treat neurological disorders. Many TMS applications call for large electric fields to be sharply focused on regions that often lie deep inside the brain. Unfortunately, the fields generated by present-day TMS coils diffuse and decay rapidly as they penetrate into the head. As a result, they tend to stimulate relatively large regions of tissue near the brain surface. Earlier studies suggested that a focused TMS excitation can be attained using multiple nonuniformly fed coils in a multichannel array. We propose a systematic, genetic algorithm-based technique for synthesizing multichannel arrays that minimize the volume of the excited region required to achieve a prescribed penetration depth and maintain realistic values for the input driving currents. Because multichannel arrays are costly to build, we also propose a method to convert the multichannel arrays into single-channel ones while minimally materially deteriorating performance. Numerical results show that the new multi- and single-channel arrays stimulate tissue 2.4 cm into the head while exciting 3.0 and 2.6 times less volume than conventional Figure-8 coils, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2013.2264632

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gomez, L., Cajko, F., Hernandez-Garcia, L., Grbic, A., & Michielssen, E.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2013-10
Volume
60
Issue
10
Pages
2771-2782
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2031505670
Cited by
55
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS058691, NS058691)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, deep brain stimulation, genetic algorithm optimization, penetration depth, electric field distribution, figure-8 coil, non-invasive brain stimulation
MeSH terms
Brain, Computer Simulation, Equipment Design, Humans, Magnetics, Models, Neurological, Transducers, Computer-Aided Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review