Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 254

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Dynamically Optimized SSVEP Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Speller

Yin, Erwei, Zhou, Zongtan, Jiang, Jun, Yu, Yang, Hu, Dewen·2015·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

The aim of this study was to design a dynamically optimized steady-state visually evoked potential (SSVEP) brain-computer interface (BCI) system with enhanced performance relative to previous SSVEP BCIs in terms of the number of items selectable on the interface, accuracy, and speed. In this approach, the row/column (RC) paradigm was employed in a SSVEP speller to increase the number of items. The target is detected by subsequently determining the row and column coordinates. To improve spelling accuracy, we added a posterior processing after the canonical correlation analysis (CCA) approach to reduce the interfrequency variation between different subjects and named the new signal processing method CCA-RV, and designed a real-time biofeedback mechanism to increase attention on the visual stimuli. To achieve reasonable online spelling speed, both fixed and dynamic approaches for setting the optimal stimulus duration were implemented and compared. Experimental results for 11 subjects suggest that the CCA-RV method and the real-time biofeedback effectively increased accuracy compared with CCA and the absence of real-time feedback, respectively. In addition, both optimization approaches for setting stimulus duration achieved reasonable online spelling performance. However, the dynamic optimization approach yielded a higher practical information transfer rate (PITR) than the fixed optimization approach. The average online PITR achieved by the proposed adaptive SSVEP speller, including the time required for breaks between selections and error correction, was 41.08 bit/min. These results indicate that our BCI speller is promising for use in SSVEP-based BCI applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2014.2320948

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 254

Metadata

Authors
Yin, E., Zhou, Z., Jiang, J., Yu, Y., & Hu, D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2015-06
Volume
62
Issue
6
Pages
1447-1456
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2004959199
Cited by
254
References
44
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Dynamically Optimized SSVEP Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Speller. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tbme.2014.2320948
The paper
Yin, E., Zhou, Z., Jiang, J., Yu, Y., & Hu, D. (2015). A Dynamically Optimized SSVEP Brain–Computer Interface (BCI) Speller. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2014.2320948

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.