Cited by 21Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingLow-power high-performance VLSI design

FALCON: Feature driven selective classification for energy-efficient image recognition

Open access
Panda, Priyadarshini, Ankit, Aayush, Wijesinghe, Parami, Roy, Kaushik·2017·IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems

Abstract

Machine-learning algorithms have shown outstanding image recognition/classification performance for computer vision applications. However, the compute and energy requirement for implementing such classifier models for large-scale problems is quite high. In this paper, we propose feature driven selective classification (FALCON) inspired by the biological visual attention mechanism in the brain to optimize the energy-efficiency of machine-learning classifiers. We use the consensus in the characteristic features (color/texture) across images in a dataset to decompose the original classification problem and construct a tree of classifiers (nodes) with a generic-to-specific transition in the classification hierarchy. The initial nodes of the tree separate the instances based on feature information and selectively enable the latter nodes to perform object specific classification. The proposed methodology allows selective activation of only those branches and nodes of the classification tree that are relevant to the input while keeping the remaining nodes idle. Additionally, we propose a programmable and scalable neuromorphic engine (NeuE) that utilizes arrays of specialized neural computational elements to execute the FALCON-based classifier models for diverse datasets. The structure of FALCON facilitates the reuse of nodes while scaling up from small classification problems to larger ones thus allowing us to construct classifier implementations that are significantly more efficient. We evaluate our approach for a 12-object classification task on the Caltech101 dataset and ten-object task on CIFAR-10 dataset by constructing FALCON models on the NeuE platform in 45-nm technology. Our results demonstrate up to 3.66× improvement in energy-efficiency for no loss in output quality, and even higher improvements of up to 5.91× with 3.9% accuracy loss compared to an optimized baseline network. In addition, FALCON shows an improvement in training time of up to 1.96× as compared to the traditional classification approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcad.2017.2681075

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In iCaRL, a ResNet-32 is retrained with new data and only 2000 samples of old data (exemplars) at every stage; it recovers good performance compared to LwF but still falls short of state-of-the-art by 18%.

    “In 'iCarl' [16], a ResNet-32 is retrained with new data and only 2000 samples of old data (called 'exemplars') at every stage. It is able to recover a good amount performance, compared to 'LwF' but still falls short of state-of-the-art by 18%.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panda, P., Ankit, A., Wijesinghe, P., & Roy, K.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Published
2017-12
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
2017-2029
ISSN
  • 0278-0070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1937-4151
OpenAlex
W2529958663
Cited by
21
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • C-SPIN, one of the six centers of StarNet, a Semiconductor Research Corporation Program through MARCO and DARPA
  • Semiconductor Research Corporation
  • National Science Foundation
  • Intel Corporation
  • Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
selective prediction, color and texture features, neuromorphic hardware, 45 nm CMOS, training time reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review