Cited by 15IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCloud Data Security Solutions

Privacy-Preserving Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Effective Resource Auction in Multi-Access Edge Computing

You, Feiran, Yuan, Xin, Ni, Wei, Jamalipour, Abbas·2025·IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking

Abstract

Multi-access edge computing (MEC) offloads services for mobile users to facilitate the integration of idle cloudlet resources and bring cloud services closer to users. Existing studies have focused primarily on task coordination and resource allocation with strict time constraints, and typically overlooked the potential privacy leakage of users’ participation strategies in MEC. This paper proposes a novel solution to computation offloading and privacy protection in MEC networks using a Multi-agent Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (MADDPG) framework. Our approach utilizes game theory to encourage computation offloading by modeling the interaction between cloudlets, Data Center Operators (DCOs), and users as a stochastic auction game. We formulate the computation offloading as an auction game with multiple bidders and incomplete information, and use MADDPG to find an optimal solution. To ensure privacy protection, we design a local Differential Privacy (DP) method in the MADDPG algorithm. With an$(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP mechanism, the local DP ensures that the sampled transitions, including the information on users’ actions, states, and corresponding rewards, are protected from exploitation. Analyses corroborate the effectiveness of our approach in satisfying DP and converging to an equilibrium. Simulations demonstrate the approach achieves 126.75% better quality-of-experience than a knapsack-based benchmark, when there are 60 cloudlets and up to 100 users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tccn.2024.3499342

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining deep learning with MEC enables the system to scale efficiently as the network expands.

    “Combining deep learning with MEC enables the system to scale efficiently as the network expands16.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
You, F., Yuan, X., Ni, W., & Jamalipour, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Data61 (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking
Published
2025-06
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
1887-1901
ISSN
  • 2332-7731 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2045
OpenAlex
W4404576838
Cited by
15
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
Keywords
mobile edge computing, computation offloading, privacy preservation, differential privacy, multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, MADDPG, auction game, incomplete information, cloudlets, data center operators, quality of experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review