Cited by 3Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningCryptography and Data Security

TMRB: Trusted Multimedia Scheme With Redactable Blockchain

Zhang, Tao·2025·IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics

Abstract

Multimedia applications are ubiquitous in our daily lives. There are some problems and challenges in multimedia applications, like fake news, misleading multimedia content, content security, and copyright management. Blockchain has been a promising solution to address these challenges. However, there is a conflict between the immutability of blockchain and redaction requirements in media application scenarios. In the paper, we propose a trusted multimedia scheme with redactable blockchain (TMRB), which combines redactable blockchain, consortium blockchain, and hybrid storage scheme. With blockchain, integrity and reliability of information stored on TMRB can be guaranteed. Hybrid storage scheme in TMRB can resolve storage challenges of blockchain. Specific redaction policies for media applications are proposed to meet requirements for media scenarios. Experiments show that extra costs introduced in TMRB by trapdoor key reconstruction accounts only 20% of time used by PBFT under 64 consensus nodes with 21 faulty nodes, which is acceptable. TMRB is the first to apply redactable blockchain in media application scenarios, which can provide consumers with a trusted multimedia platform, improve trust, foster a trusted multimedia ecosystem, and provide new use cases for Web 3.0. Consumers can benefit from TMRB, which can also be extended to other multimedia related applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tce.2025.3542637

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Zhang, T.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Tao
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics
Published
2025-05
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
3099-3107
ISSN
  • 0098-3063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-4127
OpenAlex
W4407638882
Cited by
3
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
3.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Guangxi Key Laboratory of Trusted Software (kx202016)
  • Key Laboratory of Film and TV Media Technology of Zhejiang Province (2020E10015)
  • Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Financial Science and Technology Innovation, Fuzhou University, Fujian Jiangxia University (KF1901)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3132024728)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
redactable blockchain, consortium blockchain, content integrity, content security, copyright management, fake news, PBFT consensus, Web 3.0, media applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review