The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hierarchical Trust Management for Wireless Sensor Networks and its Applications to Trust-Based Routing and Intrusion Detection
Abstract
We propose a highly scalable cluster-based hierarchical trust management protocol for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) to effectively deal with selfish or malicious nodes. Unlike prior work, we consider multidimensional trust attributes derived from communication and social networks to evaluate the overall trust of a sensor node. By means of a novel probability model, we describe a heterogeneous WSN comprising a large number of sensor nodes with vastly different social and quality of service (QoS) behaviors with the objective to yield "ground truth" node status. This serves as a basis for validating our protocol design by comparing subjective trust generated as a result of protocol execution at runtime against objective trust obtained from actual node status. To demonstrate the utility of our hierarchical trust management protocol, we apply it to trust-based geographic routing and trust-based intrusion detection. For each application, we identify the best trust composition and formation to maximize application performance. Our results indicate that trust-based geographic routing approaches the ideal performance level achievable by flooding-based routing in message delivery ratio and message delay without incurring substantial message overhead. For trust-based intrusion detection, we discover that there exists an optimal trust threshold for minimizing false positives and false negatives. Furthermore, trust-based intrusion detection outperforms traditional anomaly-based intrusion detection approaches in both the detection probability and the false positive probability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks
Karp, B., & Kung, H. T. (2000) · Proceedings of the 6th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking · doi:10.1145/345910.345953 · Cited by 7,050
HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks
Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2004.41 · Cited by 5,025
Efficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Single-Copy Case
Spyropoulos, T., Psounis, K., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2008) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2007.897962 · Cited by 1,108
Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks
Ganeriwal, S., Balzano, L. K., & Srivastava, M. B. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks · doi:10.1145/1362542.1362546 · Cited by 808
A Survey on Trust Management for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Cho, J.-H., Swami, A., & Chen, I.-R. (2011) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2011.092110.00088 · Cited by 664
Self-citationEfficient Routing in Intermittently Connected Mobile Networks: The Multiple-Copy Case
Spyropoulos, T., Psounis, K., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2008) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2007.897964 · Cited by 645
Sensor network security: a survey
Chen, X., Makki, K., Yen, K., & Pissinou, N. (2009) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2009.090205 · Cited by 599
On trust models and trust evaluation metrics for ad hoc networks
Theodorakopoulos, G., & Baras, J. S. (2006) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2005.861390 · Cited by 511
Social Network Analysis for Information Flow in Disconnected Delay-Tolerant MANETs
Daly, E. M., & Haahr, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2008.161 · Cited by 426
Decentralized intrusion detection in wireless sensor networks
da Silva, A. P. R., Martins, M. H. T., Rocha, B. P. S., Loureiro, A. A. F., Ruiz, L. B., & Wong, H. C. (2005) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Quality of service & security in wireless and mobile networks · doi:10.1145/1089761.1089765 · Cited by 410
Cited by
A Survey of Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks
Butun, I., Morgera, S. D., & Sankar, R. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.050113.00191 · Cited by 833
A survey of intrusion detection techniques for cyber-physical systems
Mitchell, R., & Chen, I.-R. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2542049 · Cited by 768
Self-citationTrustworthiness Management in the Social Internet of Things
Nitti, M., Girau, R., & Atzori, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.105 · Cited by 508
How Can Heterogeneous Internet of Things Build Our Future: A Survey
Qiu, T., Chen, N., Li, K., Atiquzzaman, M., & Zhao, W. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2803740 · Cited by 444
Meng, W., Li, W., Xiang, Y., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.11.012 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, F., Chen, I.-R., Chang, M., & Cho, J.-H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-183
- ISSN
- 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2047301871
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 61.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hierarchical Trust Management for Wireless Sensor Networks and its Applications to Trust-Based Routing and Intrusion Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcomm.2012.031912.110179
- The paper
- Bao, F., Chen, I.-R., Chang, M., & Cho, J.-H. (2012). Hierarchical Trust Management for Wireless Sensor Networks and its Applications to Trust-Based Routing and Intrusion Detection. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcomm.2012.031912.110179
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
