The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Considerations in the Use of the Laser Flash Method for Thermal Measurements of Thermal Interface Materials
Abstract
With increasing thermal fluxes, the performance of thermal interface materials (TIMs) that are used to reduce the thermal resistance between contacting surfaces in electronic devices, such as at the die-to-heat sink or heat spreader-to-heat sink interfaces, is becoming critical. However, measuring the thermal resistances of TIMs in a manner representative of actual applications is difficult. The laser flash method is a technique that may be used to determine the thermal resistance of TIMs and their degradation under environmental exposure. This paper examines three issues associated with using the laser flash method that could limit its effectiveness in calculating thermal resistance: sample holder heating, clamping, and error in the Lee algorithm outputs due to coupon-TIM thermal diffusivity differences. As a case study, the thermal performance of polymer TIMs in pad form, as well as an adhesive and a gel, were examined. Finite element simulations indicated that, without proper consideration, sample holder heating can lead to significant error in the calculated TIM thermal conductivity values.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The laser flash method can measure thermal conductivity over -120 °C to 2800 °C with reported measurement uncertainty less than 3%.
“The laser flash method is capable of measuring thermal conductivity over a wide temperature range (-120 °C to 2800 °C [71]) with measurement uncertainty reported to be less than 3% [72].”
From Measurement Techniques for Thermal Conductivity and Interfacial Thermal Conductance of Bulk and Thin Film Materials (2016) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cites
Flash Method of Determining Thermal Diffusivity, Heat Capacity, and Thermal Conductivity
Parker, W. J., Jenkins, R. J., Butler, C. P., & Abbott, G. L. (1961) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1728417 · Cited by 3,978
Thermal Interface Materials: Historical Perspective, Status, and Future Directions
Prasher, R. (2006) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.879796 · Cited by 927
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- kohnke, 2009, ANSYS Theory Reference
- ferry, 1980, Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers
- 10.1109/TDMR.2009.2025367 · DOI
- 2001, Standard Test Method for Thermal Diffusivity of Solids by the Flash Method
- 10.1016/0894-1777(88)90043-X · DOI · Paper page
- kline, 1953, Describing uncertainties in single-sample experiments, Mech Eng, 75, 3
- 10.1109/STHERM.2006.1625204 · DOI
- gowda, 2005, Reliability testing of silicone-based thermal greases [IC cooling applications], Proc 21st Annu IEEE Semicond Therm Meas Manag Symp, 64
- viswanath, 2002, Thermal performance challenges from silicon to systems, Intel Technol J, 4, 1
- 10.1109/TADVP.2008.924231 · DOI
- 10.1109/EPTC.2008.4763637 · DOI
- samson, 2005, Interface material selection and a thermal management technique in second-generation platforms built on intel centrino mobile technology, Intel Technol J, 9, 79, 10.1535/itj.0901.06 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mejo.2008.06.079 · DOI
- 10.1109/EPTC.2008.4763639 · DOI
- 2001, Standard Test Method for Thermal Transmission Properties of Thin Thermally Conductive Solid Electrical Insulation Materials
- 10.1109/ITHERM.2002.1012515 · DOI
- lee, 1977, Thermal diffusivity in layered and dispersed composites
- chiu, 2001, An accelerated reliability test method to predict thermal grease pump-out in flip-chip applications, Proc 51st Electron Compon Technol Conf, 91
- lee, 1975, Thermal diffusivity in layered and dispersed composites
- 10.1109/STHERM.2005.1412167 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.1568127 · DOI
- graebner, 1997, Thermal Measurements in Electronics Cooling
- 10.1115/IPACK2005-73446 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11664-008-0563-8 · DOI
- 10.1109/TCAPT.2005.848483 · DOI
- 10.1109/STHERM.2003.1194349 · DOI
- 10.1109/ESIME.2006.1644070 · DOI
- 10.1109/ITHERM.2002.1012448 · DOI
- 10.1109/STHERM.1999.762433 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0026-2714(01)00129-9 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1729564 · DOI · Paper page
- koski, 1981, Improved data-reduction methods for laser-pulse-diffusivity determination with the use of minicomputers, Proc Int Joint Conf Thermophys Proper, 94
- 10.1063/1.321635 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhao, D., Qian, X., Gu, X., Jajja, S. A., & Yang, R. (2016) · Journal of Electronic Packaging · doi:10.1115/1.4034605 · Cited by 559
Metadata
- Authors
- Khuu, V., Osterman, M., Bar-Cohen, A., & Pecht, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology
- Published
- 2011-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1015-1028
- ISSN
- 2156-3950
- 2156-3985
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review