Cited by 33Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityAccess Control and TrustCryptography and Data Security

An IoT-Applicable Access Control Model Under Double-Layer Blockchain

Li, Ziyuan, Hao, Jialu, Liu, Jian, Wang, Huimei, Xian, Ming·2021·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs

Abstract

Access control in Internet of Things (IoT) systems has long been facing with single-point-of-failure, collusion and other security issues. Deploying most of the access control procedures on blockchain makes it more trustworthy. However, the miscellaneous transaction data on the public blockchain incurs an extra burden on computing and communication overhead, which hinders its application for IoT devices. Additionally, the demands of rapid response in industrial IoT scenarios (e.g., edge computing scenarios) is hardly realized under a public blockchain. In this brief, we propose an IoT-applicable access control model under an original double-layer blockchain architecture, in which the mortgage/registration and control processes can be disaggregated. Depending on this architecture, the communication overhead for IoT devices is reduced and a rapid response is achieved. With linear secret sharing scheme, attribute-based access policies for resource objects are established to ensure fine-grained access control. We further implement a smart contract prototype on Ethereum and Fisco Bcos. Extensive experiments and numerical analysis demonstrate the feasibility of our proposed model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsii.2020.3045031

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing research on blockchain computing capability maintains rules, authentication, and communication between nodes through three types of smart contracts, stores transaction data in another database, and stores only the hash pointing to the data in the blockchain.

    “Existing research on blockchain computing capability maintains the rules, authentication, and communication between different nodes through three different types of smart contracts, stores transaction data in another database, and stores only the hash pointing to the data in the blockchain [85].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, Z., Hao, J., Liu, J., Wang, H., & Xian, M.
Affiliations
National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs
Published
2021-06
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
2102-2106
ISSN
  • 1549-7747 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-3791
OpenAlex
W3111953054
Cited by
33
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801489)
  • Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2020JJ5666)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
Keywords
access control, Internet of Things, blockchain architecture, linear secret sharing, attribute-based access control, fine-grained access control, smart contracts, Ethereum, FISCO BCOS, Industrial Internet of Things, edge computing, communication overhead, collusion resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review