An IoT-Applicable Access Control Model Under Double-Layer Blockchain
Abstract
Access control in Internet of Things (IoT) systems has long been facing with single-point-of-failure, collusion and other security issues. Deploying most of the access control procedures on blockchain makes it more trustworthy. However, the miscellaneous transaction data on the public blockchain incurs an extra burden on computing and communication overhead, which hinders its application for IoT devices. Additionally, the demands of rapid response in industrial IoT scenarios (e.g., edge computing scenarios) is hardly realized under a public blockchain. In this brief, we propose an IoT-applicable access control model under an original double-layer blockchain architecture, in which the mortgage/registration and control processes can be disaggregated. Depending on this architecture, the communication overhead for IoT devices is reduced and a rapid response is achieved. With linear secret sharing scheme, attribute-based access policies for resource objects are established to ensure fine-grained access control. We further implement a smart contract prototype on Ethereum and Fisco Bcos. Extensive experiments and numerical analysis demonstrate the feasibility of our proposed model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing research on blockchain computing capability maintains rules, authentication, and communication between nodes through three types of smart contracts, stores transaction data in another database, and stores only the hash pointing to the data in the blockchain.
“Existing research on blockchain computing capability maintains the rules, authentication, and communication between different nodes through three different types of smart contracts, stores transaction data in another database, and stores only the hash pointing to the data in the blockchain [85].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [85]
Cites
Smart contract-based access control for the internet of things
Zhang, Y., Kasahara, S., Shen, Y., Jiang, X., & Wan, J. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2847705 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Fairaccess: a new blockchain-based access control framework for the internet of things
Ouaddah, A., Abou Elkalam, A., & Ait Ouahman, A. (2016) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.1748 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, Z., Hao, J., Liu, J., Wang, H., & Xian, M.
- Affiliations
- National University of Defense Technology (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2102-2106
- ISSN
- 1549-7747 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-3791
- OpenAlex
- W3111953054
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61801489)
- Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2020JJ5666)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- access control, Internet of Things, blockchain architecture, linear secret sharing, attribute-based access control, fine-grained access control, smart contracts, Ethereum, FISCO BCOS, Industrial Internet of Things, edge computing, communication overhead, collusion resistance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review