Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants

Open access
Chen, Mingming, Kuzmin, Konstantin, Szymanski, Boleslaw K.·2014·IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems

Abstract

In this paper, we first discuss the definition of modularity (Q) used as a metric for community quality and then we review the modularity maximization approaches which were used for community detection in the last decade. Then, we discuss two opposite yet coexisting problems of modularity optimization; in some cases, it tends to favor small communities over large ones while in others, large communities over small ones (so-called the resolution limit problem). Next, we overview several community quality metrics proposed to solve the resolution limit problem and discuss Modularity Density (Qds), which simultaneously avoids the two problems of modularity. Finally, we introduce two novel fine-tuned community detection algorithms that iteratively attempt to improve the community quality measurements by splitting and merging the given network community structure. The first one, referred to as Fine-tuned , is based on modularity (Q), while the second is based on Modularity Density (Qds) and denoted as Fine-tuned . Then, we compare the greedy algorithm of modularity maximization (denoted as Greedy ), Fine-tuned , and Fine-tuned on four real networks, and also on the classical clique network and the LFR benchmark networks, each of which is instantiated by a wide range of parameters. The results indicate that Fine-tuned Qdsis the most effective among the three algorithms discussed. Moreover, we show that Fine-tuned Qdscan be applied to the communities detected by other algorithms to significantly improve their results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcss.2014.2307458

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Chen, M., Kuzmin, K., & Szymanski, B. K.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems
Published
2014-03
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
46-65
ISSN
2329-924X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088162437
Cited by
301
References
9
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcss.2014.2307458
The paper
Chen, M., Kuzmin, K., & Szymanski, B. K. (2014). Community Detection via Maximization of Modularity and Its Variants. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcss.2014.2307458

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.