Cited by 54Image Retrieval and Classification TechniquesRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

Gabor wavelets combined with volumetric fractal dimension applied to texture analysis

Open access
Zuñiga, Alvaro G., Florindo, Joao B., Bruno, Odemir M.·2014·Pattern Recognition Letters

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.patrec.2013.09.023

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gabor can be combined with statistical methods to get better results.

    “Besides, Gabor can be combined with statistical methods to get better results (like LBP, GLCM, fractal), and Alvaro et al. [67] confirmed that the combinational approach based on Gabor filter and volumetric fractal dimension possesses promising ability of obtaining rich texture features.”
  • The combinational approach based on Gabor filter and volumetric fractal dimension possesses promising ability of obtaining rich texture features.

    “Alvaro et al. [67] confirmed that the combinational approach based on Gabor filter and volumetric fractal dimension possesses promising ability of obtaining rich texture features.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [8][8] J. Y. Tou, Y. H. Tay, P. Y. Lau, Gabor filters and grey-level co-occurrence matrices in texture classification, in: MMU International Symposium on Information and Communications Technologies, Petaling Jaya, 2007. -
  2. [30][30] T. Mitchell, Machine Learning (Mcgraw-Hill International Edit), 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill Education (ISE Editions), 1997. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zuñiga, A. G., Florindo, J. B., & Bruno, O. M.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Pattern Recognition Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
36
Pages
135-143
ISSN
0167-8655 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988963939
Cited by
54
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pattern Recognition Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2011/01523-1, 2012/19143-3, 2009/04362)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (473893/2010-0, 308449/2010-0)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
Gabor wavelets, texture analysis, texture classification, texture feature extraction, fractal signature, canonical analysis, feature vector concatenation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review