Cited by 27Digital Media Forensic DetectionAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesChaos-based Image/Signal Encryption

Learning to Hash for Personalized Image Authentication

Su, Zhiyong, Yao, Liang, Mei, Jialin, Zhou, Lang, Li, Weiqing·2021·IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology

Abstract

This paper takes a fresh look at the image authentication problem and proposes an alternative framework for personalized authentication based on the hash learning technology. Conventional image authentication methods tend to provide a general authentication framework for all images with the fixed quantization strategy and fixed control parameters determined based on given limited images and attacks. However, they may suffer from more or less misjudgments in practice, not to mention performance degradation when encountering out-of-sample images. Instead of proposing a new feature extraction algorithm, a novel personalized authentication framework which incorporates the distance metric learning technology and supervised quantization strategy to the process of image authentication is proposed in this paper. The tamper detection task is reformulated as a new supervised manipulation classification problem. For each input image, various content-preserving and content-changing samples are generated automatically firstly. Then, feature representations of all samples can be obtained by existing feature extraction methods. After that, a weighted large margin for manipulation classification (WLMMC) scheme is proposed to learn an effective feature mapping space to improve the classification performance between content-changing samples and content-preserving samples. During the quantization stage, a novel supervised personalized quantization strategy (SPQ), which is motivated by the observation that different attacks have different degrees of influence on feature components, is proposed to learn more compact yet discriminative binary codes for each input image. Effectiveness of the proposed framework is qualitatively and quantitatively demonstrated on a variety of images. Extensive experiments show that the proposed framework can significantly improve the authentication performance over the state-of-the-art techniques while achieve more compact hash codes flexibly as required.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcsvt.2020.3002146

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, Z., Yao, L., Mei, J., Zhou, L., & Li, W.
Affiliations
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Published
2021-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1648-1660
ISSN
  • 1051-8215 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2205
OpenAlex
W3035651807
Cited by
27
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1004904)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (30918012203)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61300160)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption
Keywords
image authentication, hash code learning, tamper detection, metric learning, binary codes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review