Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 270

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consistency-Driven Automatic Methodology to Set Interval Numerical Scales of 2-Tuple Linguistic Term Sets and Its Use in the Linguistic GDM With Preference Relation

Yucheng Dong, Herrera-Viedma, Enrique·2015·IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics

Abstract

The 2-tuple linguistic modeling is a popular tool for computing with words in decision making. In order to deal with the linguistic term sets that are not uniformly and symmetrically distributed, the numerical scale model has been developed to generalize the 2-tuple linguistic modeling. In the numerical scale model, the key task of the 2-tuple based models is the definition of a numerical scale function that establishes a one to one mapping between the linguistic information and numerical values. In this paper, we propose a consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets in the decision making problems with linguistic preference relations. This consistency-driven methodology is based on a natural premise regarding the consistency of preference relations. If linguistic preference relations provided by experts are of acceptable consistency, the corresponding transformed numerical preference relations by the established interval numerical scale are also consistent. Compared with the existing approach based on canonical characteristic values, the consistency-driven methodology provides a new way to set the interval numerical scale without the need of the semantics defined by interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Meanwhile, interval multiplicative preference relations are used in the pairwise comparisons method and the presented theory can be utilized in the pairwise comparisons method as it provides a novel approach to automatic construct interval multiplicative preference relations. Finally, we present the framework for the use of the consistency-driven automatic methodology in linguistic group decision making problems and two numerical examples are given to illustrate the feasibility and validity of this proposal.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcyb.2014.2336808

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 57 references

Cited by

See all 270

Metadata

Authors
Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Published
2015-04
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
780-792
ISSN
  • 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2275
OpenAlex
W1986686276
Cited by
270
References
57
FWCI
43.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consistency-Driven Automatic Methodology to Set Interval Numerical Scales of 2-Tuple Linguistic Term Sets and Its Use in the Linguistic GDM With Preference Relation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcyb.2014.2336808
The paper
Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015). Consistency-Driven Automatic Methodology to Set Interval Numerical Scales of 2-Tuple Linguistic Term Sets and Its Use in the Linguistic GDM With Preference Relation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2014.2336808

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.