The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making
Abstract
In those problems that deal with multiple sources of linguistic information we can find problems defined in contexts where the linguistic assessments are assessed in linguistic term sets with different granularity of uncertainty and/or semantics (multigranular linguistic contexts). Different approaches have been developed to manage this type of contexts, that unify the multigranular linguistic information in an unique linguistic term set for an easy management of the information. This normalization process can produce a loss of information and hence a lack of precision in the final results. In this paper, we shall present a type of multigranular linguistic contexts we shall call linguistic hierarchies term sets, such that, when we deal with multigranular linguistic information assessed in these structures we can unify the information assessed in them without loss of information. To do so, we shall use the 2-tuple linguistic representation model. Afterwards we shall develop a linguistic decision model dealing with multigranular linguistic contexts and apply it to a multi-expert decision-making problem.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.890332 · Cited by 2,662
Self-citation
Cited by
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators
Xu, Z. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2006.890678 · Cited by 2,678
A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.890332 · Cited by 2,662
Self-citationA new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Wang, J.-H., & Hao, J. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2006.876337 · Cited by 494
Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2336808 · Cited by 270
A survey of preference relations
Xu, Z. (2007) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081070600913726 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Herrera, F., & Martinez, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics)
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 227-234
- ISSN
- 1083-4419 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111211679
- Cited by
- 867
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/3477.915345
- The paper
- Herrera, F., & Martinez, L. (2001). A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with multigranular hierarchical linguistic contexts in multi-expert decision-making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics). https://doi.org/10.1109/3477.915345
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.