Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 346

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Event-Triggered Schemes on Leader-Following Consensus of General Linear Multiagent Systems Under Different Topologies

Xu, Wenying, Ho, Daniel W. C., Li, Lulu, Cao, Jinde·2017·IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics

Abstract

This paper investigates the leader-following consensus for multiagent systems with general linear dynamics by means of event-triggered scheme (ETS). We propose three types of schemes, namely, distributed ETS (distributed-ETS), centralized ETS (centralized-ETS), and clustered ETS (clustered-ETS) for different network topologies. All these schemes guarantee that all followers can track the leader eventually. It should be emphasized that all event-triggered protocols in this paper depend on local information and their executions are distributed. Moreover, it is shown that such event-triggered mechanism can significantly reduce the frequency of control's update. Further, positive inner-event time intervals are assured for those cases of distributed-ETS, centralized-ETS, and clustered-ETS. In addition, two methods are proposed to avoid continuous communication between agents for event detection. Finally, numerical examples are provided to illustrate the effectiveness of the ETSs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tcyb.2015.2510746

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. xiao, 2012, Average sampled-data consensus driven by edge events, Proc 31th Chin Control Conf, 6239
  2. 10.1016/j.automatica.2010.10.050 · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2010.10.050
  3. 10.1109/TAC.2011.2176362 · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2176362
  4. 10.1080/03081079.2014.973726 · doi:10.1080/03081079.2014.973726
  5. 10.1109/TCYB.2014.2313154 · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2313154
  6. 10.1145/79173.79181 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.09.005 · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2012.09.005

Cited by

See all 346

Metadata

Authors
Xu, W., Ho, D. W. C., Li, L., & Cao, J.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics
Published
2017-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
212-223
ISSN
  • 2168-2267 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-2275
OpenAlex
W2231268124
Cited by
346
References
35
FWCI
40.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • Research Grants Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (GRF CityU 11204514)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 61573096, 61503115)
  • 333 Engineering Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (no. BRA2015286)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event-Triggered Schemes on Leader-Following Consensus of General Linear Multiagent Systems Under Different Topologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tcyb.2015.2510746
The paper
Xu, W., Ho, D. W. C., Li, L., & Cao, J. (2017). Event-Triggered Schemes on Leader-Following Consensus of General Linear Multiagent Systems Under Different Topologies. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2015.2510746

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.