The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digital detection and fuzzy classification of partial discharge signals
Abstract
This paper deals with digital acquisition, classification and analysis of the stochastic features of random pulse signals generated by partial discharge (PD) phenomena. Focus is made on a new measuring system for the digital acquisition of PD-pulse signals, which operates at a sampling rate high enough to avoid the frequency aliasing, but that provides an amount of PD pulses which enables PD stochastic analysis. A separation and classification method, based on a fuzzy classifier, is developed for the analysis of the acquired PD-pulse shape signals. The result of the fuzzy classification is a cluster of signals homogeneous in terms of stochastic features of PD pulses. The classification efficiency is evaluated resorting to the PD-pulse height and phase distributions analysis. The instrumentation, and the associated classification methodology, are applied to measure and analyze PD data recorded for mica-insulated stator bars and coils, where typical defects, occurring during normal operations, were simulated. It is shown that the proposed procedure enables PD-source identification to solve the identification problems which arise, in particular, when different sources of PD are simultaneously active. In addition fuzzy classification provides an efficient noise-rejection tool.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms
Bezdek, J. C. (1981) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0450-1 · Cited by 9,881
Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks
Ripley, B. D. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812651 · Cited by 6,459
Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering
Gath, I., & Geva, A. B. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.192473 · Cited by 1,640
PD source recognition by Weibull processing of pulse height distributions
Contin, A., Montanari, G. C., & Ferraro, C. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · doi:10.1109/94.839341 · Cited by 96
Self-citation
Cited by
Fabiani, D., Montanari, G. C., Cavallini, A., & Mazzanti, G. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · doi:10.1109/tdei.2004.1306718 · Cited by 289
Self-citationEffect of supply voltage frequency on testing of insulation system
Cavallini, A., & Montanari, G. C. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation · doi:10.1109/tdei.2006.1593409 · Cited by 144
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Contin, A., Cavallini, A., Montanari, G. C., Pasini, G., & Puletti, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 335-348
- ISSN
- 1070-9878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139870867
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digital detection and fuzzy classification of partial discharge signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tdei.2002.1007695
- The paper
- Contin, A., Cavallini, A., Montanari, G. C., Pasini, G., & Puletti, F. (2002). Digital detection and fuzzy classification of partial discharge signals. IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation. https://doi.org/10.1109/tdei.2002.1007695
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.