Cited by 290Advanced Authentication Protocols SecurityPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityUser Authentication and Security Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Building PUF Based Authentication and Key Exchange Protocol for IoT Without Explicit CRPs in Verifier Database

Chatterjee, Urbi, Govindan, Vidya, Sadhukhan, Rajat, Mukhopadhyay, Debdeep, Chakraborty, Rajat Subhra, Mahata, Debashis, Prabhu, Mukesh M.·2019·IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing

DOI 10.1109/tdsc.2018.2832201

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) promise to be a critical hardware primitive to provide unique identities to billions of connected devices in Internet of Things (IoTs). In traditional authentication protocols a user presents a set of credentials with an accompanying proof such as password or digital certificate. However, IoTs need more evolved methods as these classical techniques suffer from the pressing problems of password dependency and inability to bind access requests to the “things” from which they originate. Additionally, the protocols need to be lightweight and heterogeneous. Although PUFs seem promising to develop such mechanism, it puts forward an open problem of how to develop such mechanism without needing to store the secret challenge-response pair (CRP) explicitly at the verifier end. In this paper, we develop an authentication and key exchange protocol by combining the ideas of Identity based Encryption (IBE), PUFs and Key-ed Hash Function to show that this combination can help to do away with this requirement. The security of the protocol is proved formally under the Session Key Security and the Universal Composability Framework. A prototype of the protocol has been implemented to realize a secured video surveillance camera using a combination of an Intel Edison board, with a Digilent Nexys-4 FPGA board consisting of an Artix-7 FPGA, together serving as the IoT node. We show, though the stand-alone video camera can be subjected to man-in-the-middle attack via IP-spoofing using standard network penetration tools, the camera augmented with the proposed protocol resists such attacks and it suits aptly in an IoT infrastructure making the protocol deployable for the industry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tdsc.2018.2832201

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Identity-Based Encryption from the Weil Pairing
Boneh, D., & Franklin, M. (2003) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539701398521 · Cited by 3,540
Universally composable security: a new paradigm for cryptographic protocols
Canetti, R. (2001) · Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/sfcs.2001.959888 · Cited by 3,348
Introduction to Modern Cryptography
Katz, J., & Lindell, Y. (2007) · doi:10.1201/9781420010756 · Cited by 1,238
Extracting secret keys from integrated circuits
Lim, D., Lee, J. W., Gassend, B., Suh, G. E., van Dijk, M., & Devadas, S. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2005.859470 · Cited by 1,049
Modeling attacks on physical unclonable functions
Rührmair, U., Sehnke, F., Sölter, J., Dror, G., Devadas, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (2010) · ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) · doi:10.1145/1866307.1866335 · Cited by 1,035
Controlled physical random functions
Gassend, B., Clarke, D. E., van Dijk, M., & Devadas, S. (2003) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1109/csac.2002.1176287 · Cited by 390
Mutual Authentication in IoT Systems Using Physical Unclonable Functions
Aman, M. N., Chua, K. C., & Sikdar, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703088 · Cited by 316
Cloning Physically Unclonable Functions
Helfmeier, C., Boit, C., Nedospasov, D., & Seifert, J. (2013) · IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST) · doi:10.1109/hst.2013.6581556 · Cited by 288
Slender PUF Protocol: A Lightweight, Robust, and Secure Authentication by Substring Matching
Majzoobi, M., Rostami, M., Koushanfar, F., Wallach, D. S., & Devadas, S. (2012) · IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW) · doi:10.1109/spw.2012.30 · Cited by 230
Elliptic-Curve-Based Security Processor for RFID
Lee, Y. K., Sakiyama, K., Batina, L., et al. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Computers · doi:10.1109/tc.2008.148 · Cited by 228

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 31 references

Sorted by citations

Items 201–289 of 289

Ensuring End-to-End Security in Computing Continuum Exploiting Physical Unclonable Functions
Barbareschi, M., Casola, V., & Lombardi, D. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science · doi:10.1109/cloudcom59040.2023.00051 · Cited by 4
G-PUF: An Intrinsic PUF Based on GPU Error Signatures
Forlin, B. E., Hüsemann, R., Carro, L., et al. (2020) · Proceedings/Proceedings - European Test Workshop · doi:10.1109/ets48528.2020.9131562 · Cited by 4
Authentication Scheme for IoT
Al-Taleb, N., & Zagrouba, R. (2020) · International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccit-144147971.2020.9213714 · Cited by 4
A Lightweight and Secure Puf-Based Authentication and Key-Exchange Protocol for Iot DevicesPreprint
Gupta, C., & Varshney, G. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4646453 · Cited by 4
Probably Secure PUF-Based Anonymous Mutual and Batch Authentication for Inter-Vehicular Communications in VANET
Vijayakumar, P., Rajasekaran, A. S., Maria, A., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3600097 · Cited by 3
A Forward-Secure Symmetric Authenticated Key Exchange Scheme With Privacy Preservation for Internet of Things Applications
Yu, G., Li, Q., Mao, H., et al. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3601792 · Cited by 3
A Lightweight and Efficient Authentication Protocol Based on AST PUF and Schnorr for IoT
Xie, Y., Jiang, W., Luo, H., et al. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3629693 · Cited by 3
Security authentication protocol for online English teaching system based on Internet of Things
Wang, Y., & Fan, D. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.011 · Cited by 3
A semi-centralized key agreement protocol integrated multiple security communication techniques for LLM-based autonomous driving system
Yin, L., Xu, J. F., Wang, Z., et al. (2025) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2025.104012 · Cited by 3
Privacy-Preserving Smart Road-Pricing System with Trustworthiness Evaluation in VANETs
Zhu, Q., Ji, S., Shen, J., et al. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21113658 · Cited by 3
FPGA Implementation of RO-PUF using Chaotic Maps
Azhaganantham, A., Kanimozhi, M., Gowtham, T. S., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Energy (ICAIS) · doi:10.1109/icais56108.2023.10073917 · Cited by 3
EECAAP: Efficient Edge-Computing based Anonymous Authentication Protocol for IoV
Sikarwar, H., & Das, D. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing, Data, and Analytics · doi:10.1109/hipc56025.2022.00047 · Cited by 3
Machine Learning Vulnerability Assessment of Ring Oscillator Physical Unclonable Functions
Kareem, H., & Dunaev, D. (2023) · International Conference on Control, Automation and Diagnosis (ICCAD) · doi:10.1109/iccad57653.2023.10152413 · Cited by 3
Lightweight Secure Keys Management Based on Physical Unclonable Functions
Barbareschi, M., Casola, V., & Lombardi, D. (2023) · International Workshop on Advances in Sensors and Interfaces (IWASI) · doi:10.1109/iwasi58316.2023.10164402 · Cited by 3
Actions Speak Louder Than Passwords: Dynamic Identity for Machine-to-Machine Communication
Teng, W. L., & Rasmussen, K. (2023) · International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security (ARES) · doi:10.1145/3600160.3600165 · Cited by 3
A fog‐driven three‐factor authentication protocol for secure data sharing in Internet of Vehicles cyber‐physical systems
Katyal, S., Gupta, S. R., Rawlley, O., et al. (2023) · Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.7981 · Cited by 3
Security of IoT Devices with PUF-Based ID Tags: Preventing Hardware Substitution by Combining SRAM Cells Pattern Signature and ML Techniques
Felicetti, C., Rullo, A., & Saccà, D. (2023) · IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc/picom/cbdcom/cy59711.2023.10361419 · Cited by 3
Understanding Stochastic Behavior of Self- Rectifying Memristors for Error-Corrected Physical Unclonable Functions
Zhao, X., Ruchti, J., Frisch, C., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology · doi:10.1109/tnano.2024.3413888 · Cited by 3
SSL-FL: A lightweight authentication framework for secure federated learning
Gao, X., Chen, B. Y., Yao, X. H., Yuan, Y., & Suo, Z. (2025) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-025-00029-y · Cited by 3
MACP: Multifactor Authentication using Physical Unclonable Function and Fuzzy Extractor based Chebyshev Polynomial for Industrial Internet of Things devices
Das, A. K., Afroz, S., Chandra, S., & Sinha, D. (2022) · Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies · doi:10.1002/ett.4581 · Cited by 3
KDFBA: key distribution through fingerprint based authentication using Mobile agent
Kumar, U., & Gambhir, S. (2020) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-020-08614-1 · Cited by 3
Trillion Sensors Security
Cui, P., Guin, U., & Tehranipoor, M. M. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64448-2_3 · Cited by 3
Robust and Lightweight Challenge Obfuscation Mechanism for Anti-modeling Protection of Arbiter-PUFs
Ebrahimabadi, M., Younis, M., Mehjabin, S. S., et al. (2024) · Journal of Hardware and Systems Security · doi:10.1007/s41635-024-00157-3 · Cited by 2
A PUF-based Root-of-Trust for resource-constrained IoT devices
Sassalou, E. N., Vasileiadis, S., Kazazis, S. A., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) · doi:10.1109/csr64739.2025.11130114 · Cited by 2
Evaluating IoT Data Security Metrics and Emerging Trends
Taherdoost, H., Mohamed, N. A., & Farhaoui, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Service Science Management Engineering and Technology · doi:10.4018/ijssmet.388708 · Cited by 3
An Enhanced and Lightweight Anonymous Authentication Protocol Based on PUF for VANETs
Liu, Y., Hu, X., Gao, B., et al. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2026.3660278 · Cited by 2
A Privacy-Preserving Protocol Level Approach to Prevent Machine Learning Modelling Attacks on PUFs in the Presence of Semi-Honest Verifiers
Millwood, O., Fei, H., Gope, P., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Symposium on Hardware Oriented Security and Trust (HOST) · doi:10.1109/host55118.2023.10133804 · Cited by 2
SED-SGC: A scalable, efficient, and distributed secure group communication scheme based on superlattice PUF
Liu, J., Xie, J., Liu, B., et al. (2023) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2023.109898 · Cited by 2
PUF-Based Lightweight Authentication Protocol for IoT Devices
Shah., A. V., Pandya, H. B., Soni, M., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3177-4_29 · Cited by 2
Secure, light‐weight and dynamic PUF ‐based mutual device authentication mechanism in industrial IoT networks
Jain, U. (2024) · Security and Privacy · doi:10.1002/spy2.388 · Cited by 2
Distributed Hardware-Assisted Authentication and Key Agreement Protocol for Internet of Things
Alshaeri, A., & Younis, M. (2024) · IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) · doi:10.1109/ccnc51664.2024.10454706 · Cited by 2
An Elliptic Curve Menezes–Qu–Vanston-Based Authentication and Encryption Protocol for IoT
Chanda, S., Luhach, A. K., Francis, S. A. J., et al. (2024) · Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1155/2024/5998163 · Cited by 2
Protecting Data Confidentiality and Assuring Integrity, and Preventing Rogue Devices in Medical Body Area Network
Hasan, R., Amin, M. A., Hossain, S. D., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry 5.0 (STI) · doi:10.1109/sti59863.2023.10465095 · Cited by 2
An efficient hybrid multifactor mutual authentication and session key agreement scheme for patient monitoring system using IoMT
Rai, S., Paul, R., Banerjee, S., et al. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-18625-x · Cited by 2
Robust and Efficient Data Security Solution for Pervasive Data Sharing in IoT
Lalouani, W., Younis, M., Ebrahimabadi, M., & Karimi, N. (2022) · IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/ccnc49033.2022.9700633 · Cited by 2
A secure authentication scheme based on differential public PUF
Duan, S., & Sai, G. (2022) · ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers (CF) · doi:10.1145/3528416.3530993 · Cited by 2
An Efficient Blockchain-Based Security Framework for PUF-Enabled IoT Devices in Smart Grid Infrastructure
Kumar, M. P., & Nalini, N. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-5482-5_73 · Cited by 2
Secure and Efficient Certificateless Authentication Key Agreement Protocol in VANET
Wei, G., Qin, Y., & Fu, W. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23098-1_10 · Cited by 2
PUF-based Digital Money with Propagation-of-Provenance and Offline Transfers between Two Parties
Bean, B., Minwalla, C., Tsiropoulou, E. E., et al. (2024) · ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3663676 · Cited by 2
Lightweight and Anonymous Mutual Authentication Protocol for IoT Devices With Physical Unclonable FunctionsPreprint
Meng, J., Zhang, X., Cao, T., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-267155/v1 · Cited by 2
CLE-based authenticated key agreement with PUF-secured key for vehicle-to-infrastructure
Liu, S., Chen, L., Chen, L., et al. (2025) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2025.100942 · Cited by 1
Root of trust: survey, taxonomy, and open challenges
Al-Otaiby, N. F., Hammoudeh, M., Hassine, J., & Bashir, A. K. (2026) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-025-01398-5 · Cited by 1
PUF-Based Lightweight Decentralized Authentication for UAV Networks
Ding, L., Xue, K., Ai, M., et al. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · doi:10.1109/tmc.2026.3678164 · Cited by 1
SRAM PUF-based logic locking framework for IoT authentication and IP protection
Gupta, C., Kumar, G., Gurve, M. K., et al. (2026) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2026.111143 · Cited by 1
Privacy-Preserving Smart Road Pricing System in Smart Cities
Zhu, Q., Ji, S., & Liu, Q. (2021) · IEEE Conference on Dependable and Secure Computing (DSC) · doi:10.1109/dsc49826.2021.9346274 · Cited by 1
A PUF-Based Indirect Authentication and Key Establishment Protocol for Wearable Devices
Sathi, V. N., Rohner, C., & Voigt, T. (2023) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc45041.2023.10278883 · Cited by 1
A Robust and Scalable One-PUF-to-Many Authentication and Key Agreement Scheme for Mobile Communication Network
Wang, Y., Ren, Z., & Wang, W. (2023) · International Conference on Networking and Network Applications (NaNA) · doi:10.1109/nana60121.2023.00022 · Cited by 1
IoT Device Security Using PUF-Based Tags: A Lightweight Protocol for Preventing Hardware Substitution
Felicetti, C., Rullo, A., Tagarelli, A., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-85363-0_37 · Cited by 1
An Innovative PUF-based Mutual Authentication Key Exchange Protocol with Biometric Identification
Ma, W.-B., Yang, Y., & Fang, W.-C. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043753 · Cited by 1
Evaluation of Software PUF Based on Gyroscope
Fukushima, K., Yoshimura, A., Kiyomoto, S., et al. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34339-2_13 · Cited by 1
A Lightweight Hardware Secure and Reliable Framework using Secure and Provable PUF for IoT Devices against the Machine Learning Attack
Annapurna, K. Y., & Koppad, D. (2022) · International Journal of Circuits Systems and Signal Processing · doi:10.46300/9106.2022.16.86 · Cited by 1
Masked Location based Key Exchange Mechanism for IoT Nodes
(2022) · International journal of intelligent engineering and systems · doi:10.22266/ijies2023.0228.17 · Cited by 1
A Lightweight and Secure PUF-Based Authentication and Key-exchange Protocol for IoT DevicesPreprint
Gupta, C., & Varshney, G. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3850019/v1 · Cited by 1
PUF-based AKE: Attacks, Entropy and Post-Quantum Security
Panja, S., Tripathi, N., & Safavi–Naini, R. (2025) · ACM Workshop on CPS&IoT Security and Privacy (CPSIoTSec) · doi:10.1145/3733801.3764199
Machine Learning based IoT Edge Node Security Attack and CountermeasuresPreprint
Ramnath, V. L., Islam, S. A., Aakur, S. N., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.07891
Hardware Security in India: The Journey so Far
Mukhopadhyay, D. (2020) · IITK directions · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1675-7_8
A Mixed Mutual Authentication Scheme Supporting Fault-Detection in Industrial Internet of Things
Shen, G. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57881-7_24
Anti-counterfeiting Techniques for Resources-Constrained Devices
Yılmaz, Y., Do, V.-H., & Halak, B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-62707-2_3
A Novel Secure Communication Scheme for ZigBee Mesh Network Based on Physical Unclonable Function
Xiong, J. Q., & Yu, B. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/icccs52626.2021.9449208
Towards flexible hardware authentication for IoT
Prabhakar, A., & Anjali, T. (2021) · International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC) · doi:10.1109/isncc52172.2021.9615735
A Practical Data Authentication Scheme for Unattended Wireless Sensor Networks Using Physically Unclonable Functions
Wang, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J., et al. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19208-1_48
Blockchain-based Privacy-preserving Authentication Key Agreement Protocol for Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks
Su, X., Xie, Y., Wang, H., & Wang, H. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS) · doi:10.1109/icpads56603.2022.00038
Invited Paper: Oblivious Transfer Protocol without Physical Transfer of Hardware Root-of-Trust
Boyapally, H., Kumar, C., & Mukhopadhyay, D. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3584684.3597273
Differential Emulatable PUF Design against Machine Learning Attacks for Hardware Security
Duan, S., & Cao, C. (2023) · International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME) · doi:10.1109/iceccme57830.2023.10252278
Two-factor authentication protocol based on PUF function in Internet of Vehicles
Tian, Z., He, Y., Liu, Y. B., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1145/3641584.3641745
PECMQ: Private and Encrypted Communications in IoT Systems Using PUFs and MQTT
Ali-Pour, A., & Gascon‐Samson, J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) · doi:10.1109/icdcsw63686.2024.00017 · Cited by 1
A lightweight dual-link accelerated authentication protocol based on NLFSR-XOR APUF
Xie, Y., Luo, H., Liang, L., et al. (2024) · Microelectronics Journal · doi:10.1016/j.mejo.2024.106446
CoDPoC IP: A Configurable Data Protection Circuit to Support Multiple Key Agreement Scheme
Peng, Y., Wang, J., Wang, Z., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8801-9_8
A signature-based secure interaction scheme for logistics management systems in the internet of things
Zhang, Z., Liu, X., Gong, L., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2025.1540716
Certificate-Less Single-Use Pseudonym Scheme for Countering Trajectory Tracking Attacks in ITS
Alshaeri, A., & Younis, M. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3568290
An Efficient, Secure, and Privacy-Preserving Communication Protocol for Drone-Assisted Disaster Management in Smart Cities
Momeni, M. R., Jabbari, A., & Fung, C. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2026.3714291
PRADA: A PUF Range Assisted Device Authentication for Piezoresistive Pressure Sensors
Wu, X., Wang, M., Chen, X., et al. (2025) · IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT) · doi:10.1109/wf-iot64238.2025.11270739
PLAnCo: Provable Learnability Analysis of Generic APUF Compositions Using Finite Automata Models
Chatterjee, S., Chatterjee, D., Hazra, A., & Mukhopadhyay, D. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2025.3625776
SPEAK: a Secure PUF-Enabled Authentication and Key-Exchange Protocol for IoT Devices
Donovan, I., & Idriss, T. A. (2025) · IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM) · doi:10.1109/milcom64451.2025.11310263
A Novel Forward-Secure Key Establishment Protocol from Physically Related Functions
Kuppusamy, L., Shankar, B. R., & Lee, C. K. (2025) · Journal of Information assurance and security · doi:10.2478/ias-2025-0009
Building Provably Secure Pseudo-Strong PUFs via Weak PUFs and Pseudorandom Functions for Cryptographic Protocols
Chen, C., Zhang, X., Qin, K., et al. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom66490.2025.00097
Breaking PCB-Chain: A Side Channel Assisted Attack on IoT-Friendly Blockchain Mining
Gambhir, S., Mishra, V., Chatterjee, U., et al. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16342-4_9
Lightweight PUF Authentication Protocol with NLFSR-Based Obfuscation
Deng, J., Zhang, Y., Cui, H., et al. (2026) · International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC) · doi:10.1109/iceic69189.2026.11386436
Implementation of a PUF Based Authentication Protocol Without Trusted Third Party in IoT Nodes
Narasimhan, S., & Arunachalam, M. (2026) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-20735-7_23
Evaluation of Sram and Flip Flop Cells for Physically Unclonable Functions in $5-\text{nm}$ and $3-\text{nm}$ Bulk Finfet Technologies
Wang, S. T., Delaney, M., Kronenberg, J. B., et al. (2026) · IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium proceedings · doi:10.1109/irps61424.2026.11499215
Advanced authentication and cryptographic strategies for security IOT communication
Mohammed, H. K., Mohammed, A. T., & Zaiter, M. J. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0331006
In-DRAM Signature Generation Using Simultaneous Multiple-Row Activation: An Experimental Study of Off-The-Shelf DRAM Chips
Baser, U., Yüksel, İ. E., Bostanci, F. N., Sgouras, K., Olgun, A., Demirli, E. H., Yue, Z., Songara, H., Ergin, O., & Mutlu, O. (2026) · IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks - Supplemental Volume (DSN-S) · doi:10.1109/dsn-s70715.2026.00050
TEASE: A Leak-Resilient Strong PUFs Construction via Statistically Deficient Data Release
Hassan, N., Shah, K., Chatterjee, U., & Kar, P. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2026.3705335
BEdX25519: A lightweight authenticated key exchange protocol for secure IoT device-to-device (D2D) communication using blockchain and elliptic curve cryptography
Hasan, R., Amin, M. A., Abdullah, M. I., et al. (2026) · Journal of Information Security and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jisa.2026.104539
A PUF-based Secure Aggregation Protocol for Deep Edge Devices
Barbareschi, M., Emmanuele, A., Manna, A., et al. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Computing Frontiers: Workshops and Special Sessions (CF Companion) · doi:10.1145/3801488.3807897
TMV-PUF-Based Lightweight Authentication Scheme for Dynamic UAV Networks
Hu, M., Chen, L., Liu, M., et al. (2026) · International Conference on Computer and Communication Systems (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/icccs69761.2026.11613515
BLAKE: BLE-based lightweight authentication and key-exchange via PUF
Gupta, C., & Varshney, G. (2026) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2026.104370
Advancements in memory-based cryptographic physical unclonable functions: a comprehensive review and future directions
Hong, P., Ren, Z., Li, G., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Information Security · doi:10.1007/s10207-026-01309-y
HRCred: Revocation-Consistent Hardware-Rooted Credentials for Cross-Domain Industrial Cyber–Physical Systems
Zhou, H., Lei, H., & Yang, M. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15174004

Authors: Chatterjee, U., Govindan, V., Sadhukhan, R., Mukhopadhyay, D., Chakraborty, R. S., Mahata, D., & Prabhu, M. M.
Affiliations: Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Wipro (India) (IN)
ORCID: Chatterjee, Urbi
Sadhukhan, Rajat
Mukhopadhyay, Debdeep
Chakraborty, Rajat Subhra
Mahata, Debashis
Prabhu, Mukesh M.
Venue: IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Published: 2019-05-01
Volume: 16
Issue: 3
Pages: 424-437
ISSN: 1545-5971 (ISSN-L)
1941-0018
2160-9209
DOI: 10.1109/tdsc.2018.2832201
OpenAlex: W2801237935
Semantic Scholar: fb6cb6f6f1e4a6dd07ff58073a5e27f306216b90
Cited by: 290
References: 31
Citations by year: 2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 14
FWCI: 15.18
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplorehelp/downloads/license-information/IEEE.html (vor)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
Locations: IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders: Wipro Limited, Information security education Awareness Program
Topics: Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Authentication Protocols Security
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
Keywords: physical unclonable functions, IoT device authentication, key exchange, identity-based encryption, challenge-response pairs, device identity, session key security, universal composability, man-in-the-middle attacks, IP spoofing, video surveillance cameras

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Building PUF Based Authentication and Key Exchange Protocol for IoT Without Explicit CRPs in Verifier Database

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks