Cited by 245Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignSemiconductor materials and devices2D Materials and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ultimately thin double-gate SOI MOSFETs

Abstract

The operation of 1-3 nm thick SOI MOSFETs, in double-gate (DG) mode and single-gate (SG) mode (for either front or back channel), is systematically analyzed. Strong interface coupling and threshold voltage variation, a large influence of substrate depletion underneath the buried oxide, the absence of drain current transients, and degradation in electron mobility are typical effects in these ultra-thin MOSFETs. The comparison of SG and DG configurations demonstrates the superiority of DG-MOSFETs: ideal subthreshold swing and remarkably improved transconductance (consistently higher than twice the value in SG-MOSFETs). The experimental data and the difference between SG and DG modes is explained by combining classical models with quantum calculations. The key effect in ultimately thin DG-MOSFETs is volume inversion, which primarily leads to an improvement in mobility, whereas the total inversion charge is only marginally modified.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ted.2003.811371

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1109/55.260792 · DOI
  2. 10.1109/16.817579 · DOI
  3. fiegna, 1999, single- and double-gate soi mos structures for future ulsi: a simulation study, Future Trends in Microelectronics, 115
  4. 10.1109/16.669557 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/978-3-7091-6827-1_33 · DOI
  6. ouisse, 1994, self-consistent quantum-mechanical calculations in ultrathin silicon-on-insulator structures, Journal of Applied Physics, 76, 5979, 10.1063/1.358382 · DOI
  7. 10.1063/1.371763 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/16.669563 · DOI
  9. 10.1063/1.371684 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/SOI.1999.819868 · DOI
  11. 10.1109/16.841236 · DOI
  12. mastrapasqua, 2001, measurements of low field mobility in ultra-thin soi n- and p-mosfet's, Silicon-on-Insulator Technology and Devices X Electrochem Soc Proc, 2001–3, 97
  13. 10.1016/0749-6036(90)90290-N · DOI
  14. 10.1109/16.141237 · DOI
  15. cristoloveanu, 1995, Electrical Characterization of SOI Materials and Devices
  16. 10.1109/16.777154 · DOI
  17. lim, 1983, threshold voltage of thin-film silicon-on-insulator (soi) mosfet's, IEEE Transn Electron Devices, 30, 1244, 10.1109/T-ED.1983.21282 · DOI
  18. 10.1109/16.981219 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/16.337457 · DOI
  20. 10.1049/el:19880369 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0921-4526(98)00302-0 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/IEDM.2001.979536 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0038-1101(01)00207-6 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/55.568758 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/EDL.1987.26677 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/55.285411 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/16.81634 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/55.541764 · DOI
  29. 10.1109/IEDM.1997.650416 · DOI
  30. 10.1109/IEDM.1998.746531 · DOI
  31. huang, 1999, sub 50-nm finfet: pmos, IEDM Tech Dig, annex
  32. lee, 1999, super self-aligned double-gate (ssdg) mosfet's utilizing oxidation rate difference and selective epitaxy, IEDM Tech Dig, 71
  33. 10.1109/IEDM.1992.307422 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/16.987120 · DOI
  35. 10.1109/IEDM.1995.499299 · DOI
  36. 10.1109/55.291592 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/IEDM.1998.746385 · DOI
  38. rauly, 1997, short channel effects in sub-0.1 <formula> <tex> $\mu \hbox{m}$</tex></formula> soi-mosfet's, SOI Technology and Devices VIII, 227
  39. 10.1016/S0038-1101(01)00111-3 · DOI
  40. colinge, 1997, SOI Technology Materials to VLSI
  41. gámiz, 2001, monte carlo simulation of electron transport in silicon-on-insulator devices, Silicon-on-Insulator Technology and Devices X Electrochem Soc Proc, 2001–3, 157
  42. 10.1109/55.841309 · DOI
  43. 10.1109/55.817444 · DOI
  44. 10.1109/55.468289 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/978-94-009-6842-4_13 · DOI
  46. 10.1002/pssa.2211460231 · DOI
  47. 10.1063/1.366480 · DOI
  48. 10.1109/IEDM.1995.499349 · DOI
  49. 10.1088/0022-3719/15/28/021 · DOI
  50. 10.1007/978-1-4757-3318-1_2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ernst, T., Cristoloveanu, S., Ghibaudo, G., Ouisse, T., Horiguchi, S., Ono, Y., Takahashi, Y., & Murase, K.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • NTT (Japan) (JP)
  • NTT Innovative Devices Corporation (Japan) (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices
Published
2003-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
830-838
ISSN
0018-9383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166329620
Cited by
245
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Semiconductor materials and devices
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › 2D Materials and Applications
Keywords
double-gate MOSFET, single-gate MOSFET, ultra-thin SOI, buried oxide, threshold voltage variation, interface coupling, substrate depletion, electron mobility degradation, subthreshold swing, transconductance, volume inversion, inversion charge, quantum modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review