The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory
Abstract
The management of innovation through modular product architecture strategies is gaining increasing importance for firms, both in practice and theory. Modularity refers to a new product development strategy in which interfaces shared among components in a given product architecture are specified and standardized to allow for greater substitutability of components across product families. It is argued that the degree of modularity inherent in product architectures depends on the constituent components and interfaces. This paper introduces a mathematical model, termed the modularization function, for analyzing the degree of modularity in a given product architecture. It takes into account the following variables: components; degree of coupling; and substitutability of new-to-the-firm components. The application of the modularization function is illustrated with two elevator systems from Schindler-traction and hydraulic. The comparative analysis of the elevators captures the sensitivity and dynamics of product architecture modularity created by three types of components (standard, neutral, and unique) and two types of interfaces (fundamental and optional).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Henderson, R. M., & Clark, K. B. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393549 · Cited by 8,357
PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
(2018) · Handbook of Research on New Product Development · doi:10.4337/9781784718152.00017 · Cited by 5,504
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2366.001.0001 · Cited by 3,504
The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm
Ulrich, K. (1995) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(94)00775-3 · Cited by 2,885
Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design
Sanchez, R., & Mahoney, J. T. (1996) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250171107 · Cited by 2,490
Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258154 · Cited by 2,431
Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition
(1999) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/s0278-6125(99)90108-5 · Cited by 2,322
Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity
Schilling, M. A. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259016 · Cited by 1,460
Managing in an age of modularity
Antoine, C. (2013) · Publications Docs-en-stock.com · Cited by 1,128
Managing in an age of modularity.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 1,097
Cited by
The mass customization decade: An updated review of the literature
Fogliatto, F. S., da Silveira, G. J. C., & Borenstein, D. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.002 · Cited by 710
Modularity in the design and application of therapeutic interventions
Chorpita, B. F., Daleiden, E. L., & Weisz, J. R. (2005) · Applied and Preventive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appsy.2005.05.002 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Mikkola, J. H., & Gassmann, O.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 204-218
- ISSN
- 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124768828
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tem.2003.810826
- The paper
- Mikkola, J. H., & Gassmann, O. (2003). Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2003.810826
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.