Cited by 39Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

To what extent will blockchain drive the machine economy? Perspectives from a prospective study

Schweizer, Andre, Knoll, Patricia, Urbach, Nils, von der Gracht, Heiko Andreas, Hardjono, Thomas·2020·IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

Abstract

The advancements in the fields of IT and robotics are provoking the fourth industrial revolution and transforming our economy toward the machine economy. Billions of economically autonomous machines engaging in business relationships raise novel requirements regarding security, privacy, regulation, business models, trustful transaction processing, and interoperability. A technology that promises to provide solutions to these challenges is blockchain. Neither practice has spawned productive solutions nor has research been able to assess the phenomenon profoundly. First investigations focus on specific use cases, but existing work does not examine the overall impact and role of blockchain in the machine economy. However, this knowledge is of particular importance for various stakeholders. In this article, we address this research and knowledge gap by conducting a study with 50 blockchain and machine economy experts. We establish a sound research fundament by following a literature assessment, group discussion, interviews, and qualitative data analysis. As main research instrument, we chose a Delphi study, which has a long-proven record of application in prospective studies and has been applied to examine future premises, estimates, and challenges across nearly all disciplines. This allows us to derive six key findings leading to a transparent picture of blockchain's role in the machine economy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tem.2020.2979286

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schweizer, A., Knoll, P., Urbach, N., von der Gracht, H. A., & Hardjono, T.
Affiliations
  • qbound, and the UCL Centre for Blockchain Technologies, Munich, Germany
  • University of Bayreuth (DE)
  • School of International Business and Entrepreneurship, Steinbeis University Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Connection Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
Published
2020-11
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
1169-1183
ISSN
  • 0018-9391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0040
OpenAlex
W3015214121
Cited by
39
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (publishedVersion)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, Fourth Industrial Revolution, autonomous machines, interoperability, privacy and security, regulation, business models, expert opinion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review