The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Blockchain technology innovations
Open accessAbstract
Digital world has produced efficiencies, new innovative products, and close customer relationships globally by the effective use of mobile, IoT (Internet of Things), social media, analytics and cloud technology to generate models for better decisions. Blockchain is recently introduced and revolutionizing the digital world bringing a new perspective to security, resiliency and efficiency of systems. While initially popularized by Bitcoin, Blockchain is much more than a foundation for crypto currency. It offers a secure way to exchange any kind of good, service, or transaction. Industrial growth increasingly depends on trusted partnerships; but increasing regulation, cybercrime and fraud are inhibiting expansion. To address these challenges, Blockchain will enable more agile value chains, faster product innovations, closer customer relationships, and quicker integration with the IoT and cloud technology. Further Blockchain provides a lower cost of trade with a trusted contract monitored without intervention from third parties who may not add direct value. It facilitates smart contracts, engagements, and agreements with inherent, robust cyber security features. This paper is an effort to break the ground for presenting and demonstrating the use of Blockchain technology in multiple industrial applications. A healthcare industry application, Healthchain, is formalized and developed on the foundation of Blockchain using IBM Blockchain initiative. The concepts are transferable to a wide range of industries as finance, government and manufacturing where security, scalability and efficiency must meet.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blockchain technology in healthcare: a systematic review
Agbo, C. C., Mahmoud, Q. H., & Eklund, J. M. (2019) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare7020056 · Cited by 1,131
A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things
Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2842685 · Cited by 1,078
Blockchain for industry 4.0: a comprehensive review
Bodkhe, U., Tanwar, S., Parekh, K., Khanpara, P., Tyagi, S., Kumar, N., & Alazab, M. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2988579 · Cited by 766
A Systematic Review of the Use of Blockchain in Healthcare
Hölbl, M., Kompara, M., Kamišalić, A., & Nemec Zlatolas, L. (2018) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym10100470 · Cited by 780
“Additionally, Karafiloski and Mishev [12], and Ahram et al. [13] provided overviews on blockchain technology with an emphasis on its application in big data and industrial applications.”
BackgroundBlockchain Technologies for the Internet of Things: Research Issues and Challenges
Ferrag, M. A., Derdour, M., Mukherjee, M., Derhab, A., Maglaras, L., & Janicke, H. (2019) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2018.2882794 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahram, T., Sargolzaei, A., Sargolzaei, S., Daniels, J., & Amaba, B.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-06
- Pages
- 137-141
- OpenAlex
- W2742329683
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.67
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Blockchain technology innovations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/temscon.2017.7998367
- The paper
- Ahram, T., Sargolzaei, A., Sargolzaei, S., Daniels, J., & Amaba, B. (2017). Blockchain technology innovations. 2017 IEEE Technology & Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON). https://doi.org/10.1109/temscon.2017.7998367
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.