Explainable AI for the Choquet Integral
Abstract
The modern era of machine learning is focused on data-driven solutions. While this has resulted in astonishing leaps in numerous applications, explainability has not witnessed the same growth. The reality is, most machine learning solutions are black boxes. Herein, we focus on data/information fusion in machine learning. Specifically, we explore four eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) questions relative to Choquet integral; (i) what is the quality of our inputs and their interactions, (ii) how is the information being combined, (iii) what is the quality of our training data (and thus our learned models), and (iv) what trust do we place in an output? Previously, we derived an initial set of indices for (i)-(iv) on the premise of perfect knowledge. Herein, we make XAI more accurate by taking into consideration what the machine learned. A combination of synthetic data and real-world experiments from remote sensing for fusing deep learners in the context of classification are explored. Our approach leads to performance gain, insights into what was learned, and it helps us realize better future solutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing research studies have indicated the importance of AI-human collaboration, which has emerged as a new research theme in the literature.
“The existing research studies have indicated the importance of AI-human collaboration (Fleming, 2019, Makarius et al., 2020), which has emerged as a new research theme in the literature (Murray et al., 2020).”
From Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework (2023) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 2020
Existing research has identified that collective intelligence-a symbiotic partnership between AI and human intelligence-increases the capability of human workers, leading to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turnover, and improved quality of outputs.
“In this context, existing research has identified the importance of collective intelligence, i.e., symbiotic partnership between AI and HI, and how this will also increase the capability of human workers, which will lead to higher employee productivity, better psychological outcomes, low turn-over and improved quality of outputs (Glikson and Wooley, 2020;Murray et al., 2020;von Krogh, 2018).”
From Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework (2023) · cites this paper as Murray et al., 2020
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A., & Truong, L. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Toward Accountable and Explainable Artificial Intelligence Part Two: The Framework Implementation
Vice, J., & Khan, M. M. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3163523 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murray, B. J., Islam, M. A., Pinar, A. J., Anderson, D. T., Scott, G. J., Havens, T. C., & Keller, J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- University of New Haven (US)
- Michigan Technological University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence
- Published
- 2021-08
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 520-529
- ISSN
- 2471-285X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3046046004
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - Michigan Tech (Michigan Technological University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
- Keywords
- explainable AI, Choquet integral, interaction indices, training data quality, deep learning fusion, remote sensing image classification, synthetic data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review