The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Abstract
In this paper, we provide a new (proportional) 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words (CW), which is based on the concept of "symbolic proportion." This concept motivates us to represent the linguistic information by means of 2-tuples, which are composed by two proportional linguistic terms. For clarity and generality, we first study proportional 2-tuples under ordinal contexts. Then, under linguistic contexts and based on canonical characteristic values (CCVs) of linguistic labels, we define many aggregation operators to handle proportional 2-tuple linguistic information in a computational stage for CW without any loss of information. Our approach for this proportional 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model deals with linguistic labels, which do not have to be symmetrically distributed around a medium label and without the traditional requirement of having "equal distance" between them. Moreover, this new model not only provides a space to allow a "continuous" interpolation of a sequence of ordered linguistic labels, but also provides an opportunity to describe the initial linguistic information by members of a "continuous" linguistic scale domain which does not necessarily require the ordered linguistic terms of a linguistic variable being equidistant. Meanwhile, under the assumption of equally informative (which is defined by a condition based on the concept of CCV), we show that our model reduces to Herrera and Mart/spl inodot//spl acute/nez's (translational) 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning—I
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 · Cited by 12,187
The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III
Zadeh, L. A. (1975) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(75)90017-1 · Cited by 12,139
On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking
Yager, R. R. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.87068 · Cited by 7,289
Fuzzy Sets and Systems - Theory and Applications
(1980) · Mathematics in Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/s0076-5392(09)x6008-x · Cited by 6,383
Fuzzy logic = computing with words
Zadeh, L. A. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.493904 · Cited by 3,227
Zadeh, L. A. (1997) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00077-8 · Cited by 2,897
A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.890332 · Cited by 2,662
Essentials of Fuzzy Modeling and Control
Yager, R. R., & Filev, D. (1994) · Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa) · Cited by 1,561
Essentials of fuzzy modeling and control
Pedrycz, W. (1995) · Control Engineering Practice · doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)90104-3 · Cited by 1,050
A review of fuzzy set aggregation connectives
Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1985) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/0020-0255(85)90027-1 · Cited by 929
Cited by
Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Sets for Decision Making
Rodriguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2011.2170076 · Cited by 2,328
Rodríguez, R. M., Martı́nez, L., & Herrera, F. (2013) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.04.006 · Cited by 567
Dong, Y., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2014.2336808 · Cited by 270
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets
Rodríguez, R. M., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25664-6_34 · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, J.-H., & Hao, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 435-445
- ISSN
- 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2113181660
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 14.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tfuzz.2006.876337
- The paper
- Wang, J.-H., & Hao, J. (2006). A new version of 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tfuzz.2006.876337
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.