Cited by 551Adaptive Dynamic Programming ControlAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain Systems

Observer-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Decentralized Optimal Control Design for Strict-Feedback Nonlinear Large-Scale Systems

Tong, Shaocheng, Sun, Kangkang, Sui, Shuai·2018·IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems

Abstract

In this paper, the problem of adaptive fuzzy decentralized optimal control is investigated for a class of nonlinear large-scale systems in strict-feedback form. The considered nonlinear large-scale systems contain the unknown nonlinear functions and unmeasured states. By utilizing the fuzzy logic systems to approximate the unknown nonlinear functions and cost functions, a fuzzy state observer is established to estimate the unmeasured states. The control design is divided into two phases. First, by using the state observer and the backstepping design technique, a feedforward decentralized controller with parameters adaptive laws is designed, by which the original controlled strict-feedback nonlinear large-scale system is transformed into an equivalent affine nonlinear large-scale system. Second, by using adaptive dynamic programming theory, a feedback decentralized optimal controller is developed for the equivalent affine nonlinear system. The whole adaptive fuzzy decentralized optimal control scheme consists of a feedforward decentralized controller and a feedback decentralized optimal controller. It is shown that the proposed adaptive fuzzy decentralized optimal control approach can guarantee that all the signals in the closed-loop system are bounded, and the tracking errors converge to a small neighborhood of zero. In addition, the proposed control approach can guarantee that the cost functions are minimized. Simulation results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control approach.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tfuzz.2017.2686373

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proposed method avoids requiring precise nonlinearity knowledge by approximating functions via RBFNNs using only sampled outputs, thereby reducing computational complexity.

    “Unlike existing approaches [14], [25], the method avoids requiring precise nonlinearity knowledge by approximating functions via RBFNNs using only sampled outputs, thereby reducing computational complexity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tong, S., Sun, K., & Sui, S.
Affiliations
Liaoning University of Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems
Published
2018-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
569-584
ISSN
  • 1063-6706 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0034
OpenAlex
W2603406422
Cited by
551
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 82 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 65 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 7
FWCI
31.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61374113, 61573175, 61603167)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Keywords
adaptive fuzzy control, decentralized optimal control, large-scale nonlinear systems, strict-feedback systems, fuzzy observer, backstepping control, adaptive dynamic programming, feedforward and feedback control, unmeasured state estimation, unknown nonlinearities, cost function minimization, closed-loop boundedness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review