Cited by 31Adaptive Dynamic Programming ControlReinforcement Learning in RoboticsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Reinforcement learning control for a class of discrete-time non-strict feedback multi-agent systems and application to multi-marine vehicles

Bai, Weiwei, Chen, Dewang, Zhao, Bo, D'Ariano, Andrea·2025·IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles

Abstract

A novel control design problem for a class of non-strict feedback multi-agent systems (MAS) in discrete-time form is studied based on reinforcement learning (RL) and applied to multi-marine vehicles (MMV). Firstly, for this kind of discrete-time MAS, a novel system transformation, which can not only solve the noncausal problem that exists in the backstepping method but also reduce the computational complexity, is proposed. Secondly, the algebraic-loop problem inherent in the conventional controller design is solved by compensating the dynamics and using the property of neural network (NN). Thirdly, the multi-gradient recursive (MGR) RL scheme is developed for the sake of designing the optimal controller. Finally, the stability analysis is presented, and all signals are ensured to be semi-global uniformly ultimately bounded (SGUUB) in the Lyapunov's sense. Besides, this scheme is applied to the MMV which can be described in the non-strict feedback form to extend the application of the designed controller. The MMV simulation demonstrates the validation of this scheme.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tiv.2024.3458894

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reinforcement learning eliminates the need for explicit mathematical models by autonomously learning optimal control policies through environmental interaction.

    “As a representative methodology, reinforcement learning (RL) eliminates the need for explicit mathematical models by autonomously learning optimal control policies through environmental interaction [18,19].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bai, W., Chen, D., Zhao, B., & D'Ariano, A.
Affiliations
  • Dalian Maritime University (CN)
  • Fujian University of Technology (CN)
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Department of Civil, Computer Science and Aeronautical Technologies Engineering, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles
Published
2025-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
3613-3625
ISSN
  • 2379-8858 (ISSN-L)
  • 2379-8904
OpenAlex
W4402435285
Cited by
31
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 1
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (52271360, 61976055, 61973330, 61903092)
  • Dalian Outstanding Young Scientific and Technological Talents Project (2023RY031)
  • Third Batch of Innovative Star Talent Plan in Fujian Province (003002)
  • Basic Scientific Research Project of Liaoning Education Department (JYTMS20230164)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
reinforcement learning control, multi-agent systems, nonstrict-feedback systems, discrete-time systems, backstepping control, neural network compensation, semi-global uniform ultimate boundedness, stability analysis, systemic change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review