The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Effective Evaluation Tool for Hyperspectral Target Detection: 3D Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis
Abstract
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is performed by a curve, called ROC curve, plotted based on detection probability, PD, versus false alarm probability, PF, and has been widely used as an evaluation tool for signal detection. Specifically, the area under an ROC curve (AUC) is calculated and used as a detection measure. Unfortunately, finding distributions of PDand PFto generate a continuous ROC curve is practically infeasible. This article investigates approaches to generating a discrete 2D ROC curve of ( PD, PF) without appealing for probability distributions. Since PDand PFare determined by the same threshold τ to specify a detector, an ROC curve of ( PD, PF) can only be used to evaluate the effectiveness of a detector but not target detectability (TD) and also not background suppressibility (BS). To address this issue, a 3D ROC curve is generated as a function of ( PD, PF, τ) by introducing a specific threshold parameter τ as a third independent variable. As a result, a 3D ROC curve along with its derived three 2D ROC curves of ( PD, PF), ( PD, τ), and ( PF, τ) can further be used to design new quantitative measures to evaluate the effectiveness of a detector and its TD and BS. To demonstrate the full utility of 3D ROC analysis in target detection, extensive experiments are performed on two types of targets, prior target detection and anomaly detection, to conduct a comprehensive analysis on 3D ROC curves using new designed detection measures to evaluate target/anomaly detection performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
The use of the area under the ROC curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms
Bradley, A. P. (1997) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(96)00142-2 · Cited by 7,217
AUC: A misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models
Lobo, J. M., Jiménez‐Valverde, A., & Real, R. (2008) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00358.x · Cited by 3,499
An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation
Poor, H. V. (1994) · Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2341-0 · Cited by 2,659
Adaptive multiple-band CFAR detection of an optical pattern with unknown spectral distribution
Reed, I. S., & Yu, X. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/29.60107 · Cited by 1,867
ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging
METZ, C. E. (1986) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/00004424-198609000-00009 · Cited by 1,642
(1982) · Cited by 1,288
Hyperspectral Imaging: Techniques for Spectral Detection and Classification
Chang, C. (2003) · Cited by 1,025
Self-citationPresence‐absence versus presence‐only modelling methods for predicting bird habitat suitability
Brotons, L., Thuiller, W., Araújo, M. B., & Hirzel, A. H. (2004) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03764.x · Cited by 838
Collaborative representation for hyperspectral anomaly detection
Li, W., & Du, Q. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2014.2343955 · Cited by 758
Cited by
BockNet: Blind-Block Reconstruction Network With a Guard Window for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Wang, D., Zhuang, L., Gao, L., Sun, X., Huang, M., & Plaza, A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2023.3335484 · Cited by 579
Hyperspectral anomaly detection with guided autoencoder
Xiang, P., Ali, S., Jung, S. K., & Zhou, H. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3207165 · Cited by 154
Background Reconstruction via 3D-Transformer Network for Hyperspectral Anomaly Detection
Wu, Z., & Wang, B. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15184592 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, C.-I.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 5131-5153
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W3087883793
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Effective Evaluation Tool for Hyperspectral Target Detection: 3D Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2020.3021671
- The paper
- Chang, C.-I. (2021). An Effective Evaluation Tool for Hyperspectral Target Detection: 3D Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2020.3021671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.