Cited by 37Terahertz technology and applicationsElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical MethodsElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis

Modeling Rough-Surface and Granular Scattering at Terahertz Frequencies Using the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method

Sundberg, Garth, Zurk, Lisa M., Schecklman, Scott, Henry, Sam·2010·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Exploration of the terahertz (THz) portion of the electromagnetic spectrum has recently expanded due to advances in ultrafast optical laser systems. The application of THz imaging to detect explosive materials (and other chemical agents) is a promising potential application because of the unique spectral signatures found for many explosives in the THz band. However, since the wavelength of THz radiation is on the order of tens to hundreds of micrometers, the rough interface between materials and the granular nature of material mixtures (such as explosives) may cause frequency-dependent scattering, which could mask the spectral signature. Thus, to evaluate the effectiveness of THz imaging systems, it is necessary to characterize the combined volume and rough-surface scattering effects. Because of the complexity of the media and the requirement for broadband modeling, the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) formulation is an ideal tool. In this paper, transmission measurements through granular media and reflection measurements from controlled rough surfaces are shown to be in good agreement with FDTD results. Methods for extracting the material spectral peaks from a limited number of measurements are presented and discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2010.2048717

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing models do not account for the large degree of intra-batch variation in spectra observed when measuring samples prepared with the same morphological properties.

    “Further, these models do not account for the large degree of intra-batch variation in spectra which have been observed when performing measurements on samples prepared with the same morphological properties [14].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sundberg, G., Zurk, L. M., Schecklman, S., & Henry, S.
Affiliations
Portland State University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2010-10
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
3709-3719
ISSN
0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144181289
Cited by
37
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Washington State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Terahertz technology and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Keywords
terahertz scattering, rough surface scattering, granular materials, explosives detection, terahertz imaging, spectral signatures, frequency-dependent scattering, volume scattering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review