Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pyramid of Spatial Relatons for Scene-Level Land Use Classification

Chen, Shizhi, Tian, YingLi·2015·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Local feature with bag-of-words (BOW) representation has become one of the most popular approaches in object classification and image retrieval applications in the computer vision community. The recent efforts in the remote sensing community have demonstrated that the BOW approach can also effectively apply to geographic images for the applications of classification and retrieval. However, the BOW representation discards spatial information, which is critical for the remotely sensed land use classification. Several algorithms have incorporated spatial information into the BOW representation by hard encoding coordinates of local features. Such rigid spatial encoding is not robust to translation and rotation variations, which are common characteristics of geographic images. To effectively incorporate spatial information into the BOW model for the land use classification, we propose a pyramid-of-spatial-relatons (PSR) model to capture both absolute and relative spatial relationships of local features. Unlike the conventional cooccurrence approach to describe pairwise spatial relationships between local features, the PSR model employs a novel concept of spatial relation to describe relative spatial relationship of a group of local features. As the result, the storage cost of the PSR model only linearly increases with the visual word codebook size instead of the quadratic relationship as in the cooccurrence approach. The PSR model is robust to translation and rotation variations and demonstrates excellent performance for the application of remotely sensed land use classification. On the Land Use and Land Cover image database, the PSR achieves 8% higher in the classification accuracy than the state of the art. If using only gray images, it outperforms the state of the art by more than 11%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2014.2351395

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Chen, S., & Tian, Y.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2015-04
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
1947-1957
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2001123951
Cited by
211
References
8
FWCI
21.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyramid of Spatial Relatons for Scene-Level Land Use Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2351395
The paper
Chen, S., & Tian, Y. (2015). Pyramid of Spatial Relatons for Scene-Level Land Use Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2351395

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.