The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pyramid of Spatial Relatons for Scene-Level Land Use Classification
Abstract
Local feature with bag-of-words (BOW) representation has become one of the most popular approaches in object classification and image retrieval applications in the computer vision community. The recent efforts in the remote sensing community have demonstrated that the BOW approach can also effectively apply to geographic images for the applications of classification and retrieval. However, the BOW representation discards spatial information, which is critical for the remotely sensed land use classification. Several algorithms have incorporated spatial information into the BOW representation by hard encoding coordinates of local features. Such rigid spatial encoding is not robust to translation and rotation variations, which are common characteristics of geographic images. To effectively incorporate spatial information into the BOW model for the land use classification, we propose a pyramid-of-spatial-relatons (PSR) model to capture both absolute and relative spatial relationships of local features. Unlike the conventional cooccurrence approach to describe pairwise spatial relationships between local features, the PSR model employs a novel concept of spatial relation to describe relative spatial relationship of a group of local features. As the result, the storage cost of the PSR model only linearly increases with the visual word codebook size instead of the quadratic relationship as in the cooccurrence approach. The PSR model is robust to translation and rotation variations and demonstrates excellent performance for the application of remotely sensed land use classification. On the Land Use and Land Cover image database, the PSR achieves 8% higher in the classification accuracy than the state of the art. If using only gray images, it outperforms the state of the art by more than 11%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF)
Bay, H., Ess, A., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.09.014 · Cited by 13,557 · cited 2×
“Inspired by the success of the BOW model in text retrieval literature and the robustness of local features as image representation [2], [13], [20], [27], the computer vision community adapts the BOW to represent an image by treating local features as visual words [8], [35].”
MethodBeyond Bags of Features: Spatial Pyramid Matching for Recognizing Natural Scene Categories
Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., & Ponce, J. (2006) · 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Volume 2 (CVPR'06) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2006.68 · Cited by 7,916
SUN database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo
Xiao, J., Hays, J., Ehinger, K. A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539970 · Cited by 3,283
PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors
Ke, Y., & Sukthankar, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206 · Cited by 3,237
Sampling Strategies for Bag-of-Features Image Classification
Nowak, E., Jurie, F., & Triggs, B. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744085_38 · Cited by 927
In defense of soft-assignment coding
Liu, L., Wang, L., & Liu, X. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126534 · Cited by 443
Cited by
Remote Sensing Image Scene Classification: Benchmark and State of the Art
Cheng, G., Han, J., & Lu, X. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2017.2675998 · Cited by 2,926
AID: A benchmark data set for performance evaluation of aerial scene classification
Xia, G.-S., Hu, J., Hu, F., Shi, B., Bai, X., Zhong, Y., Zhang, L., & Lu, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2017.2685945 · Cited by 2,372
Huang, B., Zhao, B., & Song, Y. (2018) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.050 · Cited by 591
Zhao, B., Zhong, Y., Xia, G.-S., & Zhang, L. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2015.2496185 · Cited by 361
MARTA GANs: unsupervised representation learning for remote sensing image classification
Lin, D., Fu, K., Wang, Y., Xu, G., & Sun, X. (2017) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2017.2752750 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., & Tian, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1947-1957
- ISSN
- 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0644
- OpenAlex
- W2001123951
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 21.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyramid of Spatial Relatons for Scene-Level Land Use Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2351395
- The paper
- Chen, S., & Tian, Y. (2015). Pyramid of Spatial Relatons for Scene-Level Land Use Classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2014.2351395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.