Cited by 3,283Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

SUN database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo

Open access
Xiao, Jianxiong, Hays, James, Ehinger, Krista A., Oliva, Aude, Torralba, Antonio·2010·2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

Abstract

Scene categorization is a fundamental problem in computer vision. However, scene understanding research has been constrained by the limited scope of currently-used databases which do not capture the full variety of scene categories. Whereas standard databases for object categorization contain hundreds of different classes of objects, the largest available dataset of scene categories contains only 15 classes. In this paper we propose the extensive Scene UNderstanding (SUN) database that contains 899 categories and 130,519 images. We use 397 well-sampled categories to evaluate numerous state-of-the-art algorithms for scene recognition and establish new bounds of performance. We measure human scene classification performance on the SUN database and compare this with computational methods. Additionally, we study a finer-grained scene representation to detect scenes embedded inside of larger scenes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cvpr.2010.5539970

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sparse-sampling strategy causes contents within frames to be less correlated, especially for long videos, implying that feature distributions are quite different.

    “Firstly, the sparse-sampling strategy is usually adopted when tackling video representation learning to reduce the training costs [21].The contents within those frames are less correlated, especially for the cases of long videos, implying the features in terms of distributions are quite different [22], [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, J., Hays, J., Ehinger, K. A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2010-06
Pages
3485-3492
ISSN
1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2017814585
Cited by
3,283
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 186 · 2025: 298 · 2024: 311 · 2023: 255 · 2022: 213 · 2021: 248 · 2020: 209 · 2019: 247 · 2018: 214 · 2017: 199 · 2016: 250 · 2015: 225 · 2014: 181 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 74
FWCI
67.50
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
scene classification, scene understanding, human performance comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review