Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 424

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scene Classification via a Gradient Boosting Random Convolutional Network Framework

Zhang, Fan, Du, Bo, Zhang, Liangpei·2016·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

Due to the recent advances in satellite sensors, a large amount of high-resolution remote sensing images is now being obtained each day. How to automatically recognize and analyze scenes from these satellite images effectively and efficiently has become a big challenge in the remote sensing field. Recently, a lot of work in scene classification has been proposed, focusing on deep neural networks, which learn hierarchical internal feature representations from image data sets and produce state-of-the-art performance. However, most methods, including the traditional shallow methods and deep neural networks, only concentrate on training a single model. Meanwhile, neural network ensembles have proved to be a powerful and practical tool for a number of different predictive tasks. Can we find a way to combine different deep neural networks effectively and efficiently for scene classification? In this paper, we propose a gradient boosting random convolutional network (GBRCN) framework for scene classification, which can effectively combine many deep neural networks. As far as we know, this is the first time that a deep ensemble framework has been proposed for scene classification. Moreover, in the experiments, the proposed method was applied to two challenging high-resolution data sets: 1) the UC Merced data set containing 21 different aerial scene categories with a submeter resolution and 2) a Sydney data set containing eight land-use categories with a 1.0-m spatial resolution. The proposed GBRCN framework outperformed the state-of-the-art methods with the UC Merced data set, including the traditional single convolutional network approach. For the Sydney data set, the proposed method again obtained the best accuracy, demonstrating that the proposed framework can provide more accurate classification results than the state-of-the-art methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2015.2488681

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 424

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, F., Du, B., & Zhang, L.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2016-03
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
1793-1802
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2291068538
Cited by
424
References
9
FWCI
66.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scene Classification via a Gradient Boosting Random Convolutional Network Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tgrs.2015.2488681
The paper
Zhang, F., Du, B., & Zhang, L. (2016). Scene Classification via a Gradient Boosting Random Convolutional Network Framework. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2015.2488681

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.