Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning to Diversify Deep Belief Networks for Hyperspectral Image Classification

Zhong, Ping, Gong, Zhiqiang, Li, Shutao, Schonlieb, Carola-Bibiane·2017·IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Abstract

In the literature of remote sensing, deep models with multiple layers have demonstrated their potentials in learning the abstract and invariant features for better representation and classification of hyperspectral images. The usual supervised deep models, such as convolutional neural networks, need a large number of labeled training samples to learn their model parameters. However, the real-world hyperspectral image classification task provides only a limited number of training samples. This paper adopts another popular deep model, i.e., deep belief networks (DBNs), to deal with this problem. The DBNs allow unsupervised pretraining over unlabeled samples at first and then a supervised fine-tuning over labeled samples. But the usual pretraining and fine-tuning method would make many hidden units in the learned DBNs tend to behave very similarly or perform as “dead” (never responding) or “potential over-tolerant” (always responding) latent factors. These results could negatively affect description ability and thus classification performance of DBNs. To further improve DBN's performance, this paper develops a new diversified DBN through regularizing pretraining and fine-tuning procedures by a diversity promoting prior over latent factors. Moreover, the regularized pretraining and fine-tuning can be efficiently implemented through usual recursive greedy and back-propagation learning framework. The experiments over real-world hyperspectral images demonstrated that the diversity promoting prior in both pretraining and fine-tuning procedure lead to the learned DBNs with more diverse latent factors, which directly make the diversified DBNs obtain much better results than original DBNs and comparable or even better performances compared with other recent hyperspectral image classification methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tgrs.2017.2675902

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Zhong, P., Gong, Z., Li, S., & Schonlieb, C.-B.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Published
2017-06
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
3516-3530
ISSN
  • 0196-2892 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0644
OpenAlex
W2603422184
Cited by
355
References
6
FWCI
35.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.