The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis in PMSG Drives for Wind Turbine Applications
Abstract
Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis are currently considered crucial means to increase the reliability and availability of wind turbines and, consequently, to reduce the wind energy cost. With similar goals, direct-drive wind turbines based on permanent magnet synchronous generators (PMSGs) with full-scale power converters are an emerging and promising technology. Numerous studies show that power converters are a significant contributor to the overall failure rate of modern wind turbines. In this context, open-circuit fault diagnosis in the two power converters of a PMSG drive for wind turbine applications is addressed in this paper. A diagnostic method is proposed for each power converter, allowing real-time detection and localization of multiple open-circuit faults. The proposed methods are suitable for integration into the drive controller and triggering remedial actions. In order to prove the reliability and effectiveness of the proposed fault diagnostic methods, several simulation and experimental results are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Condition Monitoring for Device Reliability in Power Electronic Converters: A Review
Yang, S., Xiang, D., Bryant, A., Mawby, P., Ran, L., & Tavner, P. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2010.2049377 · Cited by 1,278
Estima, J. O., & Marques Cardoso, A. J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2188877 · Cited by 377
Self-citation
Cited by
Gao, Z., Cecati, C., & Ding, S. X. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2015.2417501 · Cited by 3,135
Trends in Fault Diagnosis for Electrical Machines: A Review of Diagnostic Techniques
Henao, H., Capolino, G.-A., Fernandez-Cabanas, M., Filippetti, F., Bruzzese, C., Strangas, E., Pusca, R., Estima, J., Riera-Guasp, M., & Hedayati-Kia, S. (2014) · IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine · doi:10.1109/mie.2013.2287651 · Cited by 602
Self-citationAn Overview on Fault Diagnosis, Prognosis and Resilient Control for Wind Turbine Systems
Gao, Z., & Liu, X. (2021) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr9020300 · Cited by 281
Jlassi, I., Estima, J. O., Khojet El Khil, S., Mrabet Bellaaj, N., & Marques Cardoso, A. J. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2014.2342506 · Cited by 212
Self-citationChoi, S., Haque, M. S., Tarek, M. T. B., Mulpuri, V., Duan, Y., Das, S., Garg, V., Ionel, D. M., Masrur, M. A., Mirafzal, B., et al. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification · doi:10.1109/tte.2018.2819627 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Freire, N. M. A., Estima, J. O., & Marques Cardoso, A. J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3957-3967
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2093244782
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis in PMSG Drives for Wind Turbine Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2012.2207655
- The paper
- Freire, N. M. A., Estima, J. O., & Marques Cardoso, A. J. (2013). Open-Circuit Fault Diagnosis in PMSG Drives for Wind Turbine Applications. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2012.2207655
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
