Cited by 178Wind Turbine Control SystemsPhotovoltaic System Optimization TechniquesWind Energy Research and Development

Reinforcement-Learning-Based Intelligent Maximum Power Point Tracking Control for Wind Energy Conversion Systems

Wei, Chun, Zhang, Zhe, Qiao, Wei, Qu, Liyan·2015·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

This paper proposes an intelligent maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithm for variable-speed wind energy conversion systems (WECSs) based on the reinforcement learning (RL) method. The model-free Q-learning algorithm is used by the controller of the WECS to learn a map from states to optimal control actions online by updating the action values according to the received rewards. The experienced action values are stored in a Q-table, based on which the maximum power points (MPPs) are obtained after a certain period of online learning. The learned MPPs are then used to generate an optimum speed–power curve for fast MPPT control of the WECS. Since RL enables the WECS to learn by directly interacting with the environment, knowledge of wind turbine parameters or wind speed information is not required. The proposed MPPT control algorithm is validated by simulation studies for a 1.5-MW doubly-fed induction generator-based WECS and experimental results for a 200-W permanent-magnet synchronous generator-based WECS emulator.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2015.2420792

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior work has attempted to maximize electricity production by controlling solar panels or wind turbine blades using RL or Bayesian optimization.

    “Prior work has attempted to maximize electricity production by controlling solar panels [1,3,678] or wind turbine blades [2,833] using RL or Bayesian optimization.”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [833]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, C., Zhang, Z., Qiao, W., & Qu, L.
Affiliations
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2015-10
Volume
62
Issue
10
Pages
6360-6370
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W2025823405
Cited by
178
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
FWCI
4.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (ECCS-0954938)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wind Turbine Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Wind Energy Research and Development
Keywords
maximum power point tracking, wind energy conversion system, reinforcement learning, Q-learning, variable speed wind turbine, doubly fed induction generator, permanent magnet synchronous generator, online learning, wind turbine emulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review