Cited by 87Advanced Control Systems OptimizationStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsAdvanced Control Systems Design

Delay Estimation and Predictive Control of Uncertain Systems With Input Delay: Application to a DC Motor

Open access
Lechappe, Vincent, Rouquet, Sebastien, Gonzalez, Alberto, Plestan, Franck, Leon, Jesus De, Moulay, Emmanuel, Glumineau, Alain·2016·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

It is well known that standard predictive techniques are not very robust to parameter uncertainties and to external disturbances. Furthermore, they require the exact knowledge of the delay. In practice, these constraints are rarely satisfied. In this paper, solutions are presented to allow the use of predictive control in the presence of external disturbances, parameter uncertainties, and an unknown input delay. First, a recent predictive control method developed to attenuate the effect of external disturbances is shown to be also robust to parameter uncertainties. In addition, a delay estimator is presented to estimate unknown time-varying delays. Theoretical results are widely illustrated through experimental tests on a dc motor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2016.2527692

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [11][11] V. Léchappé, O. Salas, J. de León Morales, F. Plestan, E. Moulay, and A. Glumineau, 'Predictive control of disturbed systems with input delay: experimental validation on a DC motor,' in Time-Delay Workshop , Ann Arbor, USA, 2015. -
  2. [31][31] H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Systems , 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, 2002. -

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lechappe, V., Rouquet, S., Gonzalez, A., Plestan, F., Leon, J. D., Moulay, E., & Glumineau, A.
Affiliations
  • École Centrale de Nantes (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2016-09
Volume
63
Issue
9
Pages
5849-5857
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W2344405548
Cited by
87
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
bilateral project Mexico–Francia ((PCP 2013) 209488)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Design
Keywords
time delay estimation, predictive control, input delay, parameter uncertainty, external disturbances, robust control, time-varying delays, DC motor, disturbance rejection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review