Cited by 15Vehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Novel reaching law based predictive sliding mode control for lateral motion control of in‐wheel motor drive electric vehicle with delay estimation

Open access
Chiliveri, Vinod Rajeshwar, Kalpana, R., Subramaniam, Umashankar, Muhibbullah, Md, Padmavathi, L.·2024·IET Intelligent Transport Systems

Abstract

The lateral motion control of an in‐wheel motor drive electric vehicle (IWMD‐EV) necessitates an accurate measurement of the vehicle states. However, these measured states are always affected by delays due to sensor measurements, communication latencies, and computation time, which results in the degradation of the controller performance. Motivated by this issue, a novel reaching law based predictive sliding mode control (NRL‐PSMC) is proposed to maintain the lateral motion control of the IWMD‐EV subjected to unknown time delay. Initially, a PSMC framework is built, in which a predictor integrating with the sliding mode control is designed to eliminate the effect of time delay and generate the virtual control signals. Further, to alleviate the chattering phenomenon, a novel‐reaching law is developed, enabling the vehicle to track the desired states effectively. Subsequently, a dynamic control allocation technique is presented to optimally allocate the virtual control input to the actual control input. The accurate estimation of the aforementioned unknown delay is realized through a delay estimator. Finally, simulation and hardware‐in‐the‐loop experiments are performed for three specific driving manoeuvres, and the results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed controller design.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes a novel reaching law based predictive sliding mode control (NRL-PSMC) for lateral motion control of in-wheel motor drive electric vehicles under unknown input time delay, combining an FSA predictor, delay estimator, and dynamic control allocation. Simulations and hardware-in-the-loop tests for circular, lane-change, and J-turn manoeuvres show improved tracking and reduced chattering/oscillations versus CSMC, STSMC, and ASMC.

Key findings

  • NRL-PSMC suppresses chattering and time-delay-induced oscillations; in the circular manoeuvre with a 0.1 s delay initiated at t = 2 s, CSMC, STSMC, and ASMC show fluctuations while NRL-PSMC remains smooth and tracks desired sideslip angle and yaw rate.
  • In the lane-change manoeuvre, ASMC deviated by almost 3 m from the desired path; in the J-turn manoeuvre, ASMC deviated by approximately 4 m, whereas NRL-PSMC followed the desired trajectory accurately.
  • The delay estimator tracks the unknown delay, though in the J-turn it fails to track until t = 2 s due to absence of control signal variation, then adjusts quickly. Tire cornering stiffness estimates converge rapidly.
  • IAE and ITAE for yaw rate and sideslip angle are notably higher for CSMC, STSMC, and ASMC than for NRL-PSMC. DCA eigenvalues of Q are 0.0028; 0.0028; 0.0028; 0.0028; 0; 0, all inside the unit circle, so DCA is asymptotically stable.

Methods

  • A 2DOF vehicle lateral dynamic model with yaw moment is used; tire cornering stiffness is estimated via recursive least squares. An FSA-based predictor and gradient-descent delay estimator handle unknown input delay; PI sliding surfaces, a novel adaptive reaching law, and dynamic control allocation generate and distribute control signals.
  • Simulation is performed in MATLAB/Simulink 2022a; HIL experiments use OP4510 RT-LAB and dSPACE1104. The vehicle is assumed at 55 mph with tire-road friction coefficient 0.8; a 0.1 s delay at t = 2 s is used for circular and lane-change cases, and a time-varying delay for the J-turn. Comparisons are made against CSMC, STSMC, and ASMC.
  • Lyapunov functions prove asymptotic stability of the sideslip-angle and yaw-rate controllers; DCA stability is assessed via eigenvalues of Q.

Limitations

  • Stated in the paper: OP4510 RT-LAB has an amplitude limitation, so HIL results in Figures 9, 13, and 17 are scaled down; detailed four-wheel torque calculation is omitted; the delay estimator cannot track the unknown delay before t = 2 s in the J-turn when the control signal lacks variation.
  • Evident from the text: validation is limited to simulation and HIL, with no real-vehicle tests; the 2DOF model and assumptions such as equal front/rear steering angles, low weight transfer, and equal front-left/front-right cornering stiffness may limit generality; the data availability statement says no datasets were generated or analysed.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1049/itr2.12474

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

2 of 12 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data

    In the lane change manoeuvre with delay, the vehicle states follow the desired states accurately with the proposed NRL-PSMC.

    “the vehicle states follow the desired states accurately with the proposed NRL-PSMC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the circular manoeuvre without delay, CSMC exhibits significant chattering.

    “the CSMC exhibits significant chattering”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the circular manoeuvre, the delay estimator tracks the unknown delay more precisely.

    “the delay estimator tracks the unknown delay more precisely.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    For sideslip angle control, the control error e_beta(t) tends to 0 as t tends to infinity under control signal (35), sliding surface (29), and NRL (34).

    “Theorem 1.To prove that the control error e 𝛽 (t ) → 0 as t → ∞, then the control signal (35), sliding surface (29), and a NRL (34) are adopted to control the sideslip angle in the dynamic model (28)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The unknown input delay is bounded and there exist τ_min, τ_max such that τ_min ≤ τ ≤ τ_max.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: For all t ≥ 0, θ(t) ≠ 0.
  • Findingown data

    In the J-turn manoeuvre with time-varying delay, fluctuations can be observed in the side-slip angle and yaw rate.

    “fluctuations can be observed in the side-slip angle and yaw rate”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 14
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    If time delays are left unattended, they degrade control performance or even drive the system to instability.

    “Furthermore, if these delays are left unattended, it degrades the control performance or even drives the system to instability [9,10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] source

      The Introduction (p. 2) says that performance was clearly degraded as delay increased in a system without predictive control. That supports the performance part of the claim, but the passages do not say that unattended delays drive the system to instability. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [10] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The convergence proof of the delay estimator is presented in [9].

    “The convergence proof of the delay estimator is presented in [9].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    In the circular manoeuvre with delay, the time delay causes large fluctuations in the vehicle states and deteriorates the performances of CSMC, STSMC, and ASMC.

    “the time delay causes large fluctuations in the vehicle states and deteriorates the performances of CSMC, STSMC, and ASMC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In the circular manoeuvre without delay, NRL-PSMC is subjected to a minimum error.

    “the proposed NRL-PSMC is subjected to a minimum error.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The closed-loop system is asymptotically stable, proved theoretically using the Lyapunov function.

    “An asymptotic stability criterion of the closed-loop system is proved theoretically using the Lyapunov function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The unknown input delay is bounded and there exist τ_min, τ_max such that τ_min ≤ τ ≤ τ_max.
    • The authors state this as an assumption: For all t ≥ 0, θ(t) ≠ 0.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    The optimal actual control input ū(t) is obtained as (49).

    “The optimal actual control input ū(t ) is obtained as ū (t ) = {G -1 ( BG -1 ) † θ (t ) + [ I - ( G -1 ( BG -1 ) † B )] [ G -2 G 2 2 ū (t -T ) ] } (49 )”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: The value of the delayed control signal ϑ(t-τ) is available.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the J-turn manoeuvre, after t=2 s, the delay estimator quickly adjusts and successfully tracks the unknown delay.

    “Thereafter, it quickly adjusts and successfully tracks the unknown delay.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the lane change manoeuvre with delay, the vehicle states deviate from the desired states, which indicates the criticality of vehicle instability.

    “the vehicle states deviate from the desired states, which indicates the criticality of vehicle instability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Various techniques such as higher-order SMC, adaptive SMC, and reaching law method are implemented to overcome the chattering phenomenon.

    “Various techniques, such as higher-order SMC, adaptive SMC (ASMC), and reaching law method, are implemented to overcome the chattering phenomenon [23,24].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [23] source
    • cites [24] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A new control gain function adjusts itself based on the absolute value of a sliding surface to alleviate chattering and improve tracking performance.

    “A new control gain function is introduced, which adjusts itself based on the absolute value of a sliding surface to alleviate the chattering and improve the tracking performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The OP4510 RT-LAB has a limitation on the amplitude, so the HIL experimental results shown in Figures 9, 13, and 17 are scaled down with an appropriate ratio.

    “The OP4510 RT-LAB has the limitation on the amplitude.Therefore, to perform HIL, the experimental results shown in Figures 9, 13, and 17 are scaled down with appropriate ratio.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The dynamic control allocation (DCA) approach uses the objective function for control input constraints and has gained wide acceptance for translating virtual control signals into actual control signals.

    “However, the dynamic control allocation (DCA) approach uses the objective function for control input constraints, has gained wide acceptance for translating virtual control signals into actual control signals [20,21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] source
    • cites [21]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In the J-turn manoeuvre with time-varying delay, the vehicle's states deviate from the desired states, highlighting the criticality of vehicle instability.

    “the vehicle's states deviate from the desired states, highlighting the criticality of vehicle instability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    For all the aforementioned methods, time delays are assumed to be known and time-invariant.

    “For all the aforementioned methods, time delays are assumed to be known and time-invariant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [11] source
    • cites [12] source
    • cites [13] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisereasoning

    The IWMD-EV is subjected to very less weight transfer because the battery pack is beneath the floor and the motors are attached in wheels.

    “However, the IWMD-EV is subjected to very less weight transfer because the battery pack is beneath the floor and the motors are attached in wheels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The amplified control signal overshoots the desired setpoint, resulting in output overshoot.

    “this amplified control signal overshoots the desired setpoint, resulting in output overshoot.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The unknown time delays are eliminated, and the effectiveness and robustness of the NRL-PSMC method are validated using three cases.

    “it is evident that the unknown time delays are eliminated, and the effectiveness and robustness of the NRL-PSMC method are validated using three cases.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The proposed method is superior to counteract the input time delay and is most suitable for real-time applications.

    “the proposed method is superior to counteract the input time delay and is most suitable for real-time applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The system corrects for the overshoot by reducing the control signal, leading to undershoot and the cycle continues.

    “the system corrects for the overshoot by reducing the control signal, leading to undershoot and the cycle continues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
19 of 19
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The unknown input delay is bounded and there exist τ_min, τ_max such that τ_min ≤ τ ≤ τ_max.

    “Assumption 1. The unknown input delay is bounded and there exist 𝜏 min , 𝜏 max such that 𝜏 min ≤ 𝜏 ≤ 𝜏 max (17 )”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    For all t ≥ 0, θ(t) ≠ 0.

    “Assumption 2. For all t ≥ 0, θ (t ) ≠ 0. (22 )”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The value of the delayed control signal ϑ(t-τ) is available.

    “Remark 1.It is assumed that the value of delayed control signal 𝜗(t -𝜏) is available.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The input time delay τ is constant.

    “where 𝜏 is an input time delay considered as constant (𝜏 ∈ ).”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The front and rear steering angles are the same.

    “For this reason, the steering angles for the front and rear wheels are assumed to be the same [28].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The front left and front right tire cornering stiffness values are the same.

    “Considering this feature, it is assumed that the front left and front right tire cornering stiffness values are the same.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Very few literature investigated time delays for lateral motion control of IWMD-EV.

    “As far as the author's knowledge, very few literature investigated time delays for lateral motion control of IWMD-EV.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SMC outperforms other control strategies in robustness to disturbances, modelling errors, and insensitivity to parameter perturbations.

    “Among all the control strategies, SMC outperforms in robustness to disturbances, modelling errors, and insensitivity to parameter perturbations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The reaching law method has effectively proven to minimize chattering.

    “Of the above methods, the reaching law method has effectively proven to minimize the chattering.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    SMC has a limitation of high-frequency oscillations called chattering.

    “Though, it has a limitation of high-frequency oscillations called as chattering phenomenon.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In real-time scenarios, the input time delay is often time varying.

    “However, in real-time scenarios, the delay is often time varying.”
11 of 11

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Rear tire-force equation uses the front axle distance

    Minor

    Equation (5) defines rear tire sideslip using a 2, but the rear tire-force equation (11) uses a 1 in its yaw-rate term. Substituting the stated rear sideslip into the tire-force model gives a term containing a 2 instead.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Harkegard O.:Backstepping and control allocation with applications to flight control.Ph.D. Dissertation Linkoping University Linköping Sweden(2003)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiliveri, V. R., Kalpana, R., Subramaniam, U., Muhibbullah, M., & Padmavathi, L.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Technology Karnataka (IN)
  • Prince Sultan University (SA)
  • Bangladesh University (BD)
  • Central Electronics Engineering Research Institute (IN)
Corresponding author
Muhibbullah, Md
Venue
IET Intelligent Transport Systems
Published
2023-12-22
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
872-888
ISSN
  • 1751-956X (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-9578
OpenAlex
W4390144154
Cited by
15
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IET Intelligent Transport Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Surathkal
  • Prince Sultan University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
lateral control, reaching law, time delay estimation, unknown time delay, chattering reduction, dynamic control allocation, virtual control signals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-12.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-12.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review