The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis of Electric Vehicle Batteries Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Abstract
In electric vehicle (EV) systems, diagnosing battery states, such as state of health (SOH), is crucial to guarantee safety. Such a diagnosis can be used to determine the replacement time for a battery or to assess the driving mileage. The majority of studies in recent decades have defined SOH under fairly constrained assumptions, such as cycling within a fixed range and in fixed temperature. Unfortunately, the assumptions cannot be applied to real-life EV batteries, which for the most part are cycled arbitrarily. In clear contrast, this paper studies how SOH can be estimated in more practical environments, in which batteries must support real-world driving patterns. This paper proposes a data-driven approach to trace SOH using measurable EV data, such as current (I) and voltage (V ). While the existing data-driven approaches are mostly based on historical I/V distributions, our approach utilizes time-varying I/V instantiations, each portraying a snapshot during a short period. In particular, we design a model based on a recurrent neural network, which is highly suited to handling the sequential data. Our validation provides very robust and flexible results under various EV driving conditions, with the average error lower than 0.0765 Ah (2.46%) over all of our experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ADADELTA: An Adaptive Learning Rate Method
Zeiler, M. D. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1212.5701 · Cited by 5,322
Weng, C., Cui, Y., Sun, J., & Peng, H. (2013) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.02.012 · Cited by 561
Distributed Real-Time Anomaly Detection in Networked Industrial Sensing Systems
Chen, P.-Y., Yang, S., & McCann, J. A. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2014.2350451 · Cited by 148
Battery capacity fading estimation using a force-based incremental capacity analysis
Samad, N. A., Kim, Y., Siegel, J. B., & Stefanopoulou, A. G. (2016) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.0511608jes · Cited by 130
Cited by
Gaussian process regression for forecasting battery state of health
Richardson, R. R., Osborne, M. A., & Howey, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.004 · Cited by 732
Theissler, A., Pérez-Velázquez, J., Kettelgerdes, M., & Elger, G. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107864 · Cited by 581
Shen, S., Sadoughi, M., Li, M., Wang, Z., & Hu, C. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114296 · Cited by 537
Vidal, C., Malysz, P., Kollmeyer, P., & Emadi, A. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2980961 · Cited by 512
Gaussian Process Regression for In Situ Capacity Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries
Richardson, R. R., Birkl, C. R., Osborne, M. A., & Howey, D. A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2794997 · Cited by 407
Metadata
- Authors
- You, G.-W., Park, S., & Oh, D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
- Published
- 2017-06
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4885-4893
- ISSN
- 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9948
- OpenAlex
- W2590366686
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis of Electric Vehicle Batteries Using Recurrent Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tie.2017.2674593
- The paper
- You, G.-W., Park, S., & Oh, D. (2017). Diagnosis of Electric Vehicle Batteries Using Recurrent Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tie.2017.2674593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.