Cited by 414Vehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems

Sliding Mode Direct Yaw-Moment Control Design for In-Wheel Electric Vehicles

Ding, Shihong, Liu, Lu, Zheng, Wei Xing·2017·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics

Abstract

The direct yaw-moment control system can significantly enhance vehicle stability in critical situations. In this paper, the direct yaw-moment control strategies are proposed for in-wheel electric vehicles by using sliding mode (SM) and nonlinear disturbance observer (NDOB) techniques. The ideal sideslip angle at the center of gravity and the yaw rate are first calculated based on a linear two degree of freedom vehicle model. Then, the actual sideslip angle is identified and estimated by constructing a state observer. On this basis, a traditional discontinuous SM direct yaw-moment controller is designed to guarantee that the sideslip angle and the yaw rate will approach the ideal ones as closely as possible. To tackle the chattering problem existing in the traditional SM controller, a second-order sliding mode (SOSM) controller is further designed by taking the derivative of the controller as the new control, which implies that the actual control can be an integration of the SOSM controller. Finally, to avoid the large gains in the derived controllers, by combining the NDOB with the derived controllers, the composite control schemes are also proposed. In comparison with the discontinuous first-order SM controller, the proposed SOSM controller is shown to be more effective.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tie.2017.2682024

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, S., Liu, L., & Zheng, W. X.
Affiliations
  • Jiangsu University (CN)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics
Published
2017-08
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
6752-6762
ISSN
  • 0278-0046 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9948
OpenAlex
W2595738348
Cited by
414
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 62 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 4
FWCI
26.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation of China (61573170, 61273154)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2015M571687, 2016T90427)
  • Zhejiang Open Foundation of the Most Important Subjects
  • Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  • Australian Research Council (DP120104986)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Keywords
direct yaw moment control, sliding mode control, second-order sliding mode control, nonlinear disturbance observer, sideslip angle estimation, yaw rate control, vehicle stability, chattering reduction, composite control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review