Cited by 310Cryptography and Data SecurityCloud Data Security SolutionsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

DAC-MACS: Effective Data Access Control for Multiauthority Cloud Storage Systems

Yang, Kan, Jia, Xiaohua, Ren, Kui, Zhang, Bo, Xie, Ruitao·2013·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

Data access control is an effective way to ensure data security in the cloud. However, due to data outsourcing and untrusted cloud servers, the data access control becomes a challenging issue in cloud storage systems. Existing access control schemes are no longer applicable to cloud storage systems, because they either produce multiple encrypted copies of the same data or require a fully trusted cloud server. Ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption (CP-ABE) is a promising technique for access control of encrypted data. However, due to the inefficiency of decryption and revocation, existing CP-ABE schemes cannot be directly applied to construct a data access control scheme for multiauthority cloud storage systems, where users may hold attributes from multiple authorities. In this paper, we propose data access control for multiauthority cloud storage (DAC-MACS), an effective and secure data access control scheme with efficient decryption and revocation. Specifically, we construct a new multiauthority CP-ABE scheme with efficient decryption, and also design an efficient attribute revocation method that can achieve both forward security and backward security. We further propose an extensive data access control scheme (EDAC-MACS), which is secure under weaker security assumptions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2013.2279531

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. jahid, 2011, Easier: Encryption-based access control in social networks with efficient revocation, Proc ASIACCS'11, 411

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, K., Jia, X., Ren, K., Zhang, B., & Xie, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2013-11
Volume
8
Issue
11
Pages
1790-1801
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2048543827
Cited by
310
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Data Security Solutions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
data access control, ciphertext-policy attribute-based encryption, attribute revocation, forward and backward security, encrypted data storage, decryption efficiency, data outsourcing, cloud security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review