Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 420

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Depth-Wise Separable Convolutions and Multi-Level Pooling for an Efficient Spatial CNN-Based Steganalysis

Zhang, Ru, Zhu, Feng, Liu, Jianyi, Liu, Gongshen·2020·IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security

Abstract

For steganalysis, many studies showed that convolutional neural network (CNN) has better performances than the two-part structure of traditional machine learning methods. Existing CNN architectures use various tricks to improve the performance of steganalysis, such as fixed convolutional kernels, the absolute value layer, data augmentation and the domain knowledge. However, some designing of the network structure were not extensively studied so far, such as different convolutions (inception, xception, etc.) and variety ways of pooling(spatial pyramid pooling, etc.). In this paper, we focus on designing a new CNN network structure to improve detection accuracy of spatial-domain steganography. First, we use$3\times 3$kernels instead of the traditional$5\times 5$kernels and optimize convolution kernels in the preprocessing layer. The smaller convolution kernels are used to reduce the number of parameters and model the features in a small local region. Next, we use separable convolutions to utilize channel correlation of the residuals, compress the image content and increase the signal-to-noise ratio (between the stego signal and the image signal). Then, we use spatial pyramid pooling (SPP) to aggregate the local features and enhance the representation ability of features by multi-level pooling. Finally, data augmentation is adopted to further improve network performance. The experimental results show that the proposed CNN structure is significantly better than other five methods such as SRM, Ye-Net, Xu-Net, Yedroudj-Net and SRNet, when it is used to detect three spatial algorithms such as WOW, S-UNIWARD and HILL with a wide variety of datasets and payloads.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tifs.2019.2936913

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 420

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, R., Zhu, F., Liu, J., & Liu, G.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Published
2020
Volume
15
Pages
1138-1150
ISSN
  • 1556-6013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-6021
OpenAlex
W2969585684
Cited by
420
References
50
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depth-Wise Separable Convolutions and Multi-Level Pooling for an Efficient Spatial CNN-Based Steganalysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tifs.2019.2936913
The paper
Zhang, R., Zhu, F., Liu, J., & Liu, G. (2020). Depth-Wise Separable Convolutions and Multi-Level Pooling for an Efficient Spatial CNN-Based Steganalysis. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security. https://doi.org/10.1109/tifs.2019.2936913

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.