The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Reconfigurable Smart Sensor Interface for Industrial WSN in IoT Environment
Abstract
A sensor interface device is essential for sensor data collection of industrial wireless sensor networks (WSN) in IoT environments. However, the current connect number, sampling rate, and signal types of sensors are generally restricted by the device. Meanwhile, in the Internet of Things (IoT) environment, each sensor connected to the device is required to write complicated and cumbersome data collection program code. In this paper, to solve these problems, a new method is proposed to design a reconfigurable smart sensor interface for industrial WSN in IoT environment, in which complex programmable logic device (CPLD) is adopted as the core controller. Thus, it can read data in parallel and in real time with high speed on multiple different sensor data. The standard of IEEE1451.2 intelligent sensor interface specification is adopted for this design. It comprehensively stipulates the smart sensor hardware and software design framework and relevant interface protocol to realize the intelligent acquisition for common sensors. A new solution is provided for the traditional sensor data acquisitions. The device is combined with the newest CPLD programmable technology and the standard of IEEE1451.2 intelligent sensor specification. Performance of the proposed system is verified and good effects are achieved in practical application of IoT to water environment monitoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172
Cited by
(2019) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 291
Communication Protocols of an Industrial Internet of Things Environment: A Comparative Study
Jaloudi, S. (2019) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi11030066 · Cited by 131
5G Enabled Codesign of Energy-Efficient Transmission and Estimation for Industrial IoT Systems
Lyu, L., Chen, C., Zhu, S., & Guan, X. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2799685 · Cited by 112
Wu, Z., Meng, Z., & Gray, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2017.2704613 · Cited by 40
Smart IoT based system for vehicle noise and pollution monitoring
Patil, P. (2017) · 2017 International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICEI) · doi:10.1109/icoei.2017.8300941 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, Q., Yan, H., Zhang, C., Pang, Z., & Xu, L. D.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1417-1425
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2135138790
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 38.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.