IoT-Based Techniques for Online M2M-Interactive Itemized Data Registration and Offline Information Traceability in a Digital Manufacturing System
Open accessAbstract
The integration of internet-of-things (IoT) technologies in the industry benefits digital manufacturing applications by allowing ubiquitous interaction and collaborative automation between machines. Online data collection and data interaction are critical for real-time decision making and machine collaborations. However, due to the specificity of digital manufacturing applications, the technical gap between IoT techniques and practical machine operation could hinder the efficient data interactions, collaborations between machines, and the effectiveness as well as the accuracy of itemized data collection. This investigation, therefore, identifies some major technical problems and challenges that current IoT-based digital manufacturing is facing, and proposes a method to bridge the technical gap for itemized product management. The highlights of this investigation are: 1) a data-oriented system architecture toward flexible data interaction between machines, 2) a customized machine-to-machine protocol for machine discovery, presence, and messaging, (3) flexible data structure and data presentation for interoperability, and (4) versatile information tracing approaches for product management. The proposed solutions have been implemented in PicknPack digital food manufacturing line, and achieved ubiquitous data interaction, online data collection, and versatile product information tracing methods have shown the feasibility and significance of the presented methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Cites
Internet of Things in industries: A survey
Xu, L. D., He, W., & Li, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300753 · Cited by 5,172 · see citing works
Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance
Davis, J., Edgar, T. F., Porter, J. B., Bernaden, J., & Sarli, M. (2012) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.06.037 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Internet of Things for Enterprise Systems of Modern Manufacturing
Bi, Z., Xu, L. D., & Wang, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2300338 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
ZeroMQ: Messaging for Many Applications
Hintjens, P. (2013) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 355 · see citing works
Ghavimi, F., & Chen, H. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2361626 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Toward a standardized common M2M service layer platform: Introduction to oneM2M
Swetina, J., Lu, G., Jacobs, P., Ennesser, F., & Song, J. (2014) · IEEE Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/mwc.2014.6845045 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
A Reconfigurable Smart Sensor Interface for Industrial WSN in IoT Environment
Chi, Q., Yan, H., Zhang, C., Pang, Z., & Xu, L. D. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2306798 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
O’Donovan, P., Leahy, K., Bruton, K., & O’Sullivan, D. T. J. (2015) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0034-z · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Comparison of global food traceability regulations and requirements
Charlebois, S., Sterling, B., Haratifar, S., & Naing, S. K. (2014) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12101 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Toward better horizontal integration among IoT services
Al‐Fuqaha, A., Khreishah, A. A., Guizani, M., Rayes, A., & Mohammadi, M. (2015) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7263375 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
IoT-Based Configurable Information Service Platform for Product Lifecycle Management
Cai, H., Xu, L. D., Xu, B., Xie, C., Qin, S., & Jiang, L. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2306391 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
User Interoperability With Heterogeneous IoT Devices Through Transformation
Xiao, G., Guo, J., Xu, L. D., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2306772 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Towards a Semantic Administrative Shell for Industry 4.0 Components
Grangel-González, I., Halilaj, L., Coskun, G., et al. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc.2016.58 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
A tutorial on the internet of things: from a heterogeneous network integration perspective
Xu, K., Qu, Y., & Yang, K. (2016) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2016.7437031 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
Toward semantic interoperability in oneM2M architecture
Alaya, M. B., Medjiah, S., Thierry Monteil, A., & Drira, K. (2015) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7355582 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Wireless Cloud Networks for the Factory of Things: Connectivity Modeling and Layout Design
Savazzi, S., Rampa, V., & Spagnolini, U. (2014) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2014.2313459 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A Reference Architecture and Knowledge-Based Structures for Smart Manufacturing Networks
Papazoglou, M., van den Heuvel, W., & Mascolo, J. (2015) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/ms.2015.57 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Adaptive Multi-Channel Transmission Power Control for Industrial Wireless Instrumentation
Ikram, W., Petersen, S., Orten, P., et al. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2014.2310594 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Towards Horizontal Architecture for Autonomic M2M Service Networks
Latvakoski, J., Alaya, M. B., Ganem, H., et al. (2014) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi6020261 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
An Ontology-Based Smart Production Management System
Meridou, D., Kapsalis, A. P., Papadopoulou, M.-E. C., et al. (2015) · IT Professional · doi:10.1109/mitp.2015.112 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Review on the Use of Blockchain for the Internet of Things
Fernandez-Carames, T. M., & Fraga-Lamas, P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2842685 · Cited by 1,078 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wu, Z., Meng, Z., & Gray, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2017-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2397-2405
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2616365938
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission through PicknPack Project (311987)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › IoT Networks and Protocols
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Keywords
- Internet of Things, digital manufacturing, machine-to-machine communication, interoperability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
