The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Significant Permission Identification for Machine-Learning-Based Android Malware Detection
Abstract
The alarming growth rate of malicious apps has become a serious issue that sets back the prosperous mobile ecosystem. A recent report indicates that a new malicious app for Android is introduced every 10 s. To combat this serious malware campaign, we need a scalable malware detection approach that can effectively and efficiently identify malware apps. Numerous malware detection tools have been developed, including system-level and network-level approaches. However, scaling the detection for a large bundle of apps remains a challenging task. In this paper, we introduce Significant Permission IDentification (SigPID), a malware detection system based on permission usage analysis to cope with the rapid increase in the number of Android malware. Instead of extracting and analyzing all Android permissions, we develop three levels of pruning by mining the permission data to identify the most significant permissions that can be effective in distinguishing between benign and malicious apps. SigPID then utilizes machine-learning-based classification methods to classify different families of malware and benign apps. Our evaluation finds that only 22 permissions are significant. We then compare the performance of our approach, using only 22 permissions, against a baseline approach that analyzes all permissions. The results indicate that when a support vector machine is used as the classifier, we can achieve over 90% of precision, recall, accuracy, and F-measure, which are about the same as those produced by the baseline approach while incurring the analysis times that are 4-32 times less than those of using all permissions. Compared against other state-of-the-art approaches, SigPID is more effective by detecting 93.62% of malware in the dataset and 91.4% unknown/new malware samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Fast algorithms for mining association rules
Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1998) · Cited by 11,307
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
Drebin: Effective and Explainable Detection of Android Malware in Your Pocket
Arp, D., Spreitzenbarth, M., Hübner, M., Gascon, H., & Rieck, K. (2014) · Proceedings 2014 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2014.23247 · Cited by 2,331
Android permissions demystified
Felt, A. P., Chin, E., Hanna, S., Song, D., & Wagner, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Computer and communications security · doi:10.1145/2046707.2046779 · Cited by 1,291
Enck (2014) · doi:10.1145/2619091 · Cited by 1,203
RiskRanker: scalable and accurate zero-day android malware detection
Grace, M., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Q., Zou, S., & Jiang, X. (2012) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/2307636.2307663 · Cited by 595
Decision Tree and SVM-Based Data Analytics for Theft Detection in Smart Grid
Jindal, A., Dua, A., Kaur, K., Singh, M., Kumar, N., & Mishra, S. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2016.2543145 · Cited by 547
Multi-key privacy-preserving deep learning in cloud computing
Li, P., Li, J., Huang, Z., Li, T., Gao, C.-Z., Yiu, S.-M., & Chen, K. (2017) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.02.006 · Cited by 462
Self-citation
Cited by
A Comprehensive Review on Malware Detection Approaches
Aslan, O., & Samet, R. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2963724 · Cited by 649
Wang, W., Zhao, M., & Wang, J. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-018-0803-6 · Cited by 284
Fed-IIoT: A Robust Federated Malware Detection Architecture in Industrial IoT
Taheri, R., Shojafar, M., Alazab, M., & Tafazolli, R. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2020.3043458 · Cited by 218
A long short‐term memory‐based model for greenhouse climate prediction
Liu, Y., Li, D., Wan, S., Wang, F., Dou, W., Xu, X., Li, S., Ma, R., & Qi, L. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22620 · Cited by 209
When Machine Learning Meets Privacy in 6G: A Survey
Sun, Y., Liu, J., Wang, J., Cao, Y., & Kato, N. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.3011561 · Cited by 211
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, J., Sun, L., Yan, Q., Li, Z., Srisa-an, W., & Ye, H.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3216-3225
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2792310543
- Cited by
- 607
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 56.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Significant Permission Identification for Machine-Learning-Based Android Malware Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2017.2789219
- The paper
- Li, J., Sun, L., Yan, Q., Li, Z., Srisa-an, W., & Ye, H. (2018). Significant Permission Identification for Machine-Learning-Based Android Malware Detection. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2017.2789219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.