Cited by 218Advanced Malware Detection TechniquesPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Fed-IIoT: A Robust Federated Malware Detection Architecture in Industrial IoT

Taheri, Rahim, Shojafar, Mohammad, Alazab, Mamoun, Tafazolli, Rahim·2021·IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics

Abstract

The sheer volume of industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) malware is one of the most serious security threats in today's interconnected world, with new types of advanced persistent threats and advanced forms of obfuscations. This article presents a robust federated learning based architecture called Fed-IIoT for detecting Android malware applications in IIoT. Fed-IIoT consists of two parts: first, participant side, where the data are triggered by two dynamic poisoning attacks based on a generative adversarial network (GAN) and federated GAN; and second, server side, which aims to monitor the global model and shape a robust collaboration training model, by avoiding anomaly in aggregation by a GAN network (A3GAN) and adjust two GAN-based countermeasure algorithms. One of the main advantages of Fed-IIoT is that devices can safely participate in the IIoT and efficiently communicate with each other, with no privacy issues. We evaluate our solutions through experiments on various features using three IoT datasets. The results confirm the high accuracy rates of our attack and defense algorithms and show that the A3GAN defensive approach preserves the robustness of data privacy for Android mobile users and is about 8% higher accuracy with existing state-of-the-art solutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tii.2020.3043458

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taheri, R., Shojafar, M., Alazab, M., & Tafazolli, R.
Affiliations
  • Shiraz University of Technology (IR)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
Published
2021-12
Volume
17
Issue
12
Pages
8442-8452
ISSN
  • 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0050
OpenAlex
W3113308842
Cited by
218
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 24
FWCI
16.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
federated learning, malware detection, Industrial Internet of Things, Android malware, data poisoning, generative adversarial networks, data privacy preservation, advanced persistent threats, malware obfuscation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review