The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enhancing Power Grid Resilience Through an IEC61850-Based EV-Assisted Load Restoration
Open accessAbstract
Contrary to reliability analysis in power systems with the main mission on safely and securely withstanding credible contingencies in day-to-day operations, resilience assessments are centered on high-impact low probability (HILP) events in the grid. This paper proposes an autonomous load restoration architecture founded on IEC 61850-8-1 GOOSE communication protocol to engender an enhanced feeder-level resilience in active power distribution grids. Different from the past research on outage management solutions, most of which 1) are not resilience-driven; 2) are reactive solutions to local single-fault events; and 3) do not address both network built-in flexibilities and flexible resources. The proposed solution harnesses 1) the imported power and flexibility from the neighboring networks; 2) distributed energy resources; and 3) vehicle to grid capacity of electric vehicles aggregations to enhance the feeder-level resourcefulness for agile response and recovery. Through real-time self-reconfiguration strategies, the suggested solution is capable of coping both single and subsequent outage events, and will engender a heightened resilience before and during the contingency period. Moreover, a resilience evaluation framework, which quantifies the contribution of all resources involved in service restoration, is developed. Real-time performance of the designed architecture is evaluated on a real-world power distribution grid using a real-time hardware-in-the-loop platform. Numerical case studies through a number of diverse scenarios demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed restoration solution in practicing an enhanced resilience in power distribution systems in response to HILP scenarios.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IEC 61850 has become the de facto or preferred communication standard for substation automation in the smart grid.
“IEC 61850 [9,10,11,12,13,14] has become the de facto standard for substation communication within the smart grid.”
From Vulnerability and Impact Analysis of the IEC 61850 GOOSE Protocol in the Smart Grid (2021) · cites this paper as [6]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2016.2574900 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijepes.2015.07.030 · DOI
- 10.1109/PESGM.2016.7741721 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSTE.2016.2598365 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2009.2033969 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2004.829156 · DOI
- 10.1109/EEEIC.2015.7165443 · DOI
- 10.1109/MELE.2015.2509879 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2016.2579999 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2017.2747136 · DOI
- 10.1049/cp.2012.0752 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRERA.2015.7418485 · DOI
- 10.1109/APAP.2011.6180703 · DOI
- 10.1109/TII.2018.2789448 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2227500 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TSG.2016.2623818 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsr.2010.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2005.846063 · DOI
- 10.1109/EPECS.2015.7368509 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2016.2558628 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.084 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRD.2013.2289955 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2016.2622858 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSG.2016.2591531 · DOI
- 10.1109/MPE.2015.2397334 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/PESMG.2013.6672862 · DOI
- 10.1049/iet-est.2018.5023 · DOI
- 10.1109/AMPS.2015.7312748 · DOI
- 10.1109/TTE.2016.2616864 · DOI
- 10.1109/JPROC.2010.2066250 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPWRS.2015.2396524 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vulnerability and Impact Analysis of the IEC 61850 GOOSE Protocol in the Smart Grid
Reda, H. T., Ray, B., Peidaee, P., Anwar, A., Mahmood, A., Kalam, A., & Islam, N. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041554 · Cited by 80
“As a consequence, it is critical to analyze the vulnerabilities of the smart grid and identify mitigation techniques [3,5,6].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Jamborsalamati, P., Hossain, M. J., Taghizadeh, S., Konstantinou, G., Manbachi, M., & Dehghanian, P.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- George Washington University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1799-1810
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2949715751
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Optimal Power Flow Distribution
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Keywords
- grid resilience, load restoration, IEC 61850, electric vehicles, vehicle-to-grid, distributed energy resources, high-impact low-probability events, self-reconfiguration, service restoration, resilience evaluation framework, distribution networks, hardware-in-the-loop
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review