The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Distributed Deep Learning System for Web Attack Detection on Edge Devices
Abstract
With the development of Internet of Things (IoT) and cloud technologies, numerous IoT devices and sensors transmit huge amounts of data to cloud data centers for further processing. While providing us considerable convenience, cloud-based computing and storage also bring us many security problems, such as the abuse of information collection and concentrated web servers in the cloud. Traditional intrusion detection systems and web application firewalls are becoming incompatible with the new network environment, and related systems with machine learning or deep learning are emerging. However, cloud-IoT systems increase attacks against web servers, since data centralization carries a more attractive reward. In this article, based on distributed deep learning, we propose a web attack detection system that takes advantage of analyzing URLs. The system is designed to detect web attacks and is deployed on edge devices. The cloud handles the above challenges in the paradigm of the Edge of Things. Multiple concurrent deep models are used to enhance the stability of the system and the convenience in updating. We implemented experiments on the system with two concurrent deep models and compared the system with existing systems by using several datasets. The experimental results with 99.410% in accuracy, 98.91% in true positive rate (TPR), and 99.55% in detection rate of normal requests (DRN) demonstrate the system is competitive in detecting web attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classification
Joulin, A., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., & Mikolov, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-2068 · Cited by 4,545
Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learning
Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z. B., & Swami, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3052973.3053009 · Cited by 3,495
(1998) · Cited by 3,476
DeepLog: Anomaly Detection and Diagnosis from System Logs through Deep Learning
Du, M., Li, F., Zheng, G., & Srikumar, V. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/3133956.3134015 · Cited by 1,835
Deep neural network based malware detection using two dimensional binary program features
Saxe, J., & Berlin, K. (2015) · 2015 10th International Conference on Malicious and Unwanted Software (MALWARE) · doi:10.1109/malware.2015.7413680 · Cited by 711
A survey of key management schemes in wireless sensor networks
Xiao, Y., Rayi, V. K., Sun, B., Du, X., Hu, F., & Galloway, M. (2007) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2007.04.009 · Cited by 582
Self-citationDu, X., Guizani, M., Xiao, Y., & Chen, H.-H. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · doi:10.1109/twc.2009.060598 · Cited by 380
Self-citationDroid-Sec: deep learning in android malware detection
Yuan, Z., Lu, Y., Wang, Z., & Xue, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on SIGCOMM · doi:10.1145/2619239.2631434 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Federated Learning for intrusion detection system: Concepts, challenges and future directions
Agrawal, S., Sarkar, S., Aouedi, O., Yenduri, G., Piamrat, K., Alazab, M., Bhattacharya, S., Maddikunta, P. K. R., & Gadekallu, T. R. (2022) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2022.09.012 · Cited by 457
Cao, H., Liu, S., Zhao, R., & Xiong, X. (2020) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1177/1550147720919698 · Cited by 70
A survey on differential privacy for medical data analysis
Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Yang, H., & Meng, Q. (2024) · Annals of Data Science · doi:10.1007/s40745-023-00475-3 · Cited by 66
Deep Learning in NLP for Anomalous HTTP Requests Detection
Anh Nguyen, M. T., Tong, V., Souihi, S. B., & Souihi, S. (2023) · 2023 19th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) · doi:10.23919/cnsm59352.2023.10327888 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Tian, Z., Luo, C., Qiu, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1963-1971
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W2971076825
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 26.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Distributed Deep Learning System for Web Attack Detection on Edge Devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tii.2019.2938778
- The paper
- Tian, Z., Luo, C., Qiu, J., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2020). A Distributed Deep Learning System for Web Attack Detection on Edge Devices. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2938778
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
