Security and Privacy-Enhanced Federated Learning for Anomaly Detection in IoT Infrastructures
Open accessAbstract
Internet of Things (IoT) anomaly detection is significant due to its fundamental roles of securing modern critical infrastructures, such as falsified data injection detection and transmission line faults diagnostic in smart grids. Researchers have proposed various detection methods fostered by machine learning (ML) techniques. Federated learning (FL), as a promising distributed ML paradigm, has been employed recently to improve detection performance due to its advantages of privacy-preserving and lower latency. However, existing FL-based methods still suffer from efficiency, robustness, and security challenges. To address these problems, in this article, we initially introduce a blockchain-empowered decentralized and asynchronous FL framework for anomaly detection in IoT systems, which ensures data integrity and prevents single-point failure while improving the efficiency. Further, we design an improved differentially private FL based on generative adversarial nets, aiming to optimize data utility throughout the training process. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first system to employ a decentralized FL approach with privacy-preserving for IoT anomaly detection. Simulation results on the real-world dataset demonstrate the superior performance from aspects of robustness, accuracy, and fast convergence while maintaining high level of privacy and security protection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the IoT system, privacy protection includes identity privacy protection of RFID, identity and location privacy protection of mobile terminal users, and privacy protection technology under big data; centralized processing of sensor data without direct relation to specific user identity provides identity privacy protection.
“In the IoT system, privacy protection includes identity privacy protection of RFID, identity and location privacy protection of mobile terminal users, and privacy protection technology under big data. The data collected by the sensor need to be processed in a centralized way, but the data source is not directly related to the specific user identity, which provides identity privacy protection [18].”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Wireless sensor networks centered around IPv6 are particularly vulnerable to routing attacks.
“Wireless sensor networks centered around IPv6 are particularly vulnerable to routing attacks.”
From A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Cites
Federated Learning With Differential Privacy: Algorithms and Performance Analysis
Wei, K., Li, J., Ding, M., Ma, C., Yang, H. H., Farokhi, F., Jin, S., Quek, T. Q. S., & Vincent Poor, H. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2020.2988575 · Cited by 2,400 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blockchain-enabled Federated Learning: A Survey
Qu, Y., Uddin, M. P., Gan, C., Xiang, Y., Gao, L., & Yearwood, J. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3524104 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Self-citationMyrzashova, R., Alsamhi, S. H., Shvetsov, A. V., Hawbani, A., & Wei, X. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3263598 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
A Survey of IoT Privacy Security: Architecture, Technology, Challenges, and Trends
Sun, P., Shen, S., Wan, Y., Wu, Z., Fang, Z., & Gao, X.-Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3372518 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Cui, L., Qu, Y., Xie, G., Zeng, D., Li, R., Shen, S., & Yu, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Taiyuan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- China University of Geosciences (CN)
- Kanazawa University (JP)
- Shaoxing University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3492-3500
- ISSN
- 1551-3203 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0050
- OpenAlex
- W3196498627
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 13.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics (publishedVersion)
- Own your potential (DEAKIN) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Shanxi Province Science Foundation for Youths (201901D211306)
- Australian Research Council (DP180102828, DP200101374)
- Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Funds (YDZX20191400002270)
- Key Research and Development Plan Project (201803D421039)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Keywords
- federated learning, IoT anomaly detection, privacy preservation, blockchain, differential privacy, generative adversarial networks, data integrity, smart grid, transmission line fault diagnosis, critical infrastructure security
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review